From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@s-opensource.com,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
hyun.kwon@xilinx.com, soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] of: Make return types of to_of_node and of_fwnode_handle macros consistent
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 19:37:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1668125.RyNuczo2n4@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171102095918.7041-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Hi Sakari,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thursday, 2 November 2017 11:59:18 EET Sakari Ailus wrote:
> (Fixed Mauro's e-mail.)
>
> to_of_node() macro checks whether the fwnode_handle passed to it is not an
> OF node, and if so, returns NULL in order to be NULL-safe. Otherwise it
> returns the pointer to the OF node which the fwnode_handle contains.
>
> The problem with returning NULL is that its type was void *, which
> sometimes matters. Explicitly return struct device_node * instead.
>
> Make a similar change to of_fwnode_handle() as well.
>
> Fixes: d20dc1493db4 ("of: Support const and non-const use for to_of_node()")
> Fixes: debd3a3b27c7 ("of: Make of_fwnode_handle() safer")
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Could you check whether this addresses the smatch issue with the xilinx
> driver?
>
> Thanks.
>
> include/linux/of.h | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index b240ed69dc96..0651231c115e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static inline bool is_of_node(const struct fwnode_handle
> *fwnode) is_of_node(__to_of_node_fwnode) ? \
> container_of(__to_of_node_fwnode, \
> struct device_node, fwnode) : \
> - NULL; \
> + (struct device_node *)NULL; \
> })
>
> #define of_fwnode_handle(node) \
> @@ -169,7 +169,8 @@ static inline bool is_of_node(const struct fwnode_handle
> *fwnode) typeof(node) __of_fwnode_handle_node = (node); \
> \
> __of_fwnode_handle_node ? \
> - &__of_fwnode_handle_node->fwnode : NULL; \
> + &__of_fwnode_handle_node->fwnode : \
> + (struct fwnode_handle *)NULL; \
> })
>
> static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-02 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2117711.dO2rQLXOup@avalon>
2017-11-02 9:57 ` [PATCH 1/1] of: Make return types of to_of_node and of_fwnode_handle macros consistent Sakari Ailus
2017-11-02 9:59 ` [RESEND PATCH " Sakari Ailus
2017-11-02 17:37 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2017-11-06 21:45 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1668125.RyNuczo2n4@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hyun.kwon@xilinx.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@s-opensource.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).