public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: arm/rockchip.yaml - many separate entries instead of enums
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 22:54:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1681233.QkHrqEjB74@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce367384-3d44-b7a9-06cd-1ca1f2ddf7e9@kernel.org>

Hey :-) ,

Am Dienstag, 29. März 2022, 19:05:24 CEST schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> Hi Heiko,
> 
> I found that Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml uses
> pattern of one board per item in oneOf.
> 
> This leads to quite big file, with many entries, although gives nice
> description for each board.

that was the original intention in doing it this way, preserving the
normal readability while adding machine readability to it :-)

> I find enum-based pattern, like FSL [1], much more readable and compact.
> What do you think? I could re-organize the arm/rockchip.yaml, but I
> don't want to mess with your preference.

I do like the current way as it does only contains one way of doing it.

As far as I can see, the fsl one has multiple types, like the one you
pointed at, for a list of boards + one soc that works for the simple
plethora of regular boards.

But also additional types that do it similarly to Rockchip like the 
	"i.MX6Q Advantech DMS-BA16 boards"
directly below it.


As we have both cases here as well, I really don't like this mix
but instead really like to have only one approach, hence the
one-entry-per-board-family we do in rockchip.yaml [2]

For human readability I really do consider having _one_ way
of describing boards superior to mixing approaches and the
automated parsing doesn't care, as long as the syntax is correct ;-)


Heiko

[2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml#L507

> [1]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml#L191
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 





  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-29 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-29 17:05 arm/rockchip.yaml - many separate entries instead of enums Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-03-29 20:54 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2022-03-30  7:16   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1681233.QkHrqEjB74@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox