From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Fix support of Exynos4210 rev0 SoC Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:26:15 +0200 Message-ID: <1696892.zdvbYPFFr0@amdc1227> References: <1366036922-4103-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <201304222310.34775.arnd@arndb.de> <517692FD.9080005@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <517692FD.9080005@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, thomas.abraham@linaro.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Kukjin, On Tuesday 23 of April 2013 22:56:13 Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 04/23/13 06:10, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 15 April 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> This patch extends exynos_init_time() function to handle Exynos4210 rev0 > >> SoC, which differs in availability of system timers and needs different > >> clocksource initialization. > >> > >> This makes it possible to use exynos_init_time() function as init_time > >> callback for all Exynos-based boards, including Universal_C210, which > >> originally had to use samsung_timer_init(). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > > Note that it would be helpful to mention here that this is required for > > the calling samsung_timer_init from the exynos4-dt.c file. > > I did 'amend' as per your suggestion and added your ack on this series. > > Thanks. > > - Kukjin Since the samsung-time rework patches were replaced with a non-invasive subset with different semantics (going to send them in a while), this patch should be replaced with new version I'm going to send (in a while as well). Best regards, -- Tomasz Figa Samsung Poland R&D Center SW Solution Development, Kernel and System Framework