From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0F63155307; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 12:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724244575; cv=none; b=AK2VtgVWhHYshlYf8Kbs6dId2qApYk9i2cYWhuhTaRu/9xnP6PoihDE6er1NKzfwcfW7ioSBW7Jnkdf3iMkvfXvrsesZDAlouxNRp5SgEg73ZiIo6ZmATjx28EIwYDhCEIFpEH3pA6YNDhVW95gMUIG34ViX+n5M4XSOTnwivNM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724244575; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AXxmUU4wdER3ZZjM11AkrS+24GgkSlMY6GankGo8It0=; h=Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Message-Id:Subject; b=PzJ5zDAu9xGjXs+f4pSiB5lSmzYhoaCOcCDclshfMK5rAwKxFQvF5Tx3HKmFre0T+GBXndAhNfW/HqYFsbtQEpE2JH5oFLfFE50AsGa6Gkbc+pSoaQJpl+t1s/c0hjYFGXdU0u30uZfWnO900mBXHWZIeCtMeq+HqrnYBXsF4mc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SWG7ju8K; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SWG7ju8K" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A77EC32782; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 12:49:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1724244574; bh=AXxmUU4wdER3ZZjM11AkrS+24GgkSlMY6GankGo8It0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=SWG7ju8KMMWojJ6QeXRG0k/6unfDyHUixpMtJbCdG/G6VRdJxRFD7EOqYrGA33Ja7 g9N2EF9qklpYK1V4VsWaZTBcaEaBt2qxUFVQKNDCMF9mYgBNJdj01jLPvllZNpPSMl YzWmB1kR6IE38Eb9k9DTXjVsGSHJMzcqliQyDbgm+0+crd1S454A4or0O9FUVJcvb7 UMqjjp+i3bxoIFRdSwu/RgvuVRNYg1pJPOLSL8wkmvOJbTGYLFHRU3ERrnhV21gWgl F2wwGwI8tiF9F2Bfr7s4vP1nQgS/ua5Ji3BNHlkorw6cHkK5rskQ/SIUtGrFKGBrKw hAQR+O/q8wjeg== Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 07:49:32 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" To: Alexander Dahl Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla , Claudiu Beznea , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Christian Melki In-Reply-To: <20240821105943.230281-4-ada@thorsis.com> References: <20240821105943.230281-1-ada@thorsis.com> <20240821105943.230281-4-ada@thorsis.com> Message-Id: <172424457261.3725889.15234571126892278786.robh@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/12] dt-bindings: nvmem: microchip-otpc: Add compatible for SAM9X60 On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 12:59:34 +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote: > The SAM9X60 SoC family has a similar OTPC to the SAMA7G5 family. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch: yamllint warnings/errors: dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.example.dtb: efuse@e8c00000: compatible:0: 'microchip,sam9x60-otpc' was expected from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml# /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.example.dtb: efuse@e8c00000: compatible:1: 'microchip,sama7g5-otpc' was expected from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml# /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.example.dtb: efuse@e8c00000: compatible: ['microchip,sama7g5-otpc', 'syscon'] is too short from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml# /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.example.dtb: efuse@e8c00000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('compatible' was unexpected) from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/microchip,sama7g5-otpc.yaml# doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240821105943.230281-4-ada@thorsis.com The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency should be noted in *this* patch. If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.