From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2F4328504F; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 13:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759930123; cv=none; b=Xxl/Jk/pZxzzkV1Gn1stfbKNPnzaCx0TWn5N23sWuNtYR2kAQobr/RzGLTh/kdDtHgzk4cALhhT+QVn/EzFSqKT/gs94b3+vJa4APf+GElbEVQMw7ZKhaTZjhuQW2QMu0tKjWRXWmpmyA+UdRU37M/bcEQs7utR9jwe+NaP5izI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759930123; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5VI0Qe4pumAMIWGqV/sJgLN0/InDus/63WaIN+igxyY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YF25oksVU+tMFHMCPMQIOA5b6Ljgrzh9gHWts6NHijAPBGph7jt8z5HgyXPvX/si0oujOBlvsfv1tbynnSqAYK+9zDLHvQi6S7OjzzZYegladLbk4Ye4kKKNwy8dHhlRNCmYz62cNatThIIcf74h3t8tUAtWsXDPz3DPi4vRl4k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GFoC7pcs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GFoC7pcs" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E95C9C4CEF4; Wed, 8 Oct 2025 13:28:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1759930122; bh=5VI0Qe4pumAMIWGqV/sJgLN0/InDus/63WaIN+igxyY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GFoC7pcsvlX5j//2T2mjRSOUYWB6wPXwmKNP839fCJRpCYKYz9io1sHrakuf/9KYH LjokgfyQykHd/1IJ5rmESrZOxU5vCrG/Gc9AZ0xdHjTD+xK5dh38FYVNPjOagskK0u AZTA+Uk0qLMSBi7RP7rtAjn3OUy5RHu9PUtJbAk6t8abvJSnqrxMQzEZWP2bWHFfiT 7Z+Y3qs8rXjDk3XgMsLmUIMKkectPh8+LeNZnQ2YkhSpsRVCUAGuJFO0TpkNiULlZw 7ldfx7sx4tqPH9AE43nzmiUgb+r4oPIYTA+x2koYgC0OafusbrpTJgSrzIzpJtQkzo lw0uDyot/sgEg== Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 08:28:40 -0500 From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" To: George Moussalem Cc: Conor Dooley , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Baruch Siach , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Konrad Dybcio , Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 5/9] dt-bindings: pwm: qcom,ipq6018-pwm: Add compatible for ipq9574 Message-ID: <175993012043.3405904.5217021551347655915.robh@kernel.org> References: <20251001-ipq-pwm-v16-0-300f237e0e68@outlook.com> <20251001-ipq-pwm-v16-5-300f237e0e68@outlook.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251001-ipq-pwm-v16-5-300f237e0e68@outlook.com> On Wed, 01 Oct 2025 18:04:21 +0400, George Moussalem wrote: > The IPQ9574 SoC contains a PWM block which is exactly the same as the > one found in IPQ6018. So let's add a compatible for IPQ9574 and use > IPQ6018 as the fallback. > > Signed-off-by: George Moussalem > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/qcom,ipq6018-pwm.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm)