Re: [PATCH 11/16] clk: tests: Add Kunit testing for nexus nodes

[Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>]

Quoting Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric) (2026-03-27 13:09:33)
> Add a nexus node with a child requesting a mapped clock in the fake DT
> overlay to verify that the parsing is also correctly working.
> 
> Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal (Schneider Electric) <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk_test.c                   | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/clk/kunit_clk_parse_clkspec.dtso | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
> index 8a17ad0d185f..cb0071955146 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
> @@ -3660,10 +3660,30 @@ static void clk_parse_and_get_parent_name(struct kunit *test)
>                            clk_parse_clkspec_1_init_data.name);
>  }
>  
> +static void clk_parse_and_get_nexus(struct kunit *test)

of_clk_get_hw_maps_thru_nexus()

> +{
> +       struct clk_parse_clkspec_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
> +       struct clk_hw *hw1, *hw2;
> +       struct device_node *np;
> +
> +       /* Get clocks by index */
> +       np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "kunit-clock-nexus-child");
> +       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> +       hw1 = of_clk_get_hw(np, 0, NULL);
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw1);
> +
> +       hw2 = of_clk_get_hw(ctx->cons_np, 1, NULL);
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, hw2);
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, hw1, hw2);

I think hw2 is expected? Rewrite it like this?

	struct clk_parse_clkspec_ctx *ctx = test->priv;
	struct clk_hw *expected;
	struct device_node *np;
	
	np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "kunit-clock-nexus-child");
	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
	expected = of_clk_get_hw(ctx->cons_np, 1, NULL);
	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, expected);

	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, expected, of_clk_get_hw(np, 0, NULL));

We're also leaking the of_node if an assert triggers so we need to use a
kunit wrapper version of of_find_node_by_name() or do a hand code
version of putting the node when kunit asserts.