From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E50719067C; Fri, 29 May 2026 01:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780018096; cv=none; b=c0M0iuk9fY6IZsM3o2elOnG4rjqvUeFueRGblQ3Zp815R9zqnzWKHVBy9RNA2WWJSJif4J1EktYhhnA3zYTml1hx+T8AXYeALQqZVHaPxkep6lDx8L7NIdnpODrgfm2BgvhC+O8JEets1QhF0pvzW9M1y7qqjhwhiiuj4DizRdE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780018096; c=relaxed/simple; bh=577YCxBQyijttrD/GDDpiPNAegNNoIYy/0sCwpR697Q=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc: To:Date:Message-ID; b=Ycubk4bLfZ2ZiaqTMOQ3J9s+0PawVVJ0Ngz/ezIdZnAQnIqAdKznAJiymh4U+hS62u/YJHcTPYFaRF4A3vshRLemTlOPIJIDW8ElJzB0Y1EAMrP+G76FtCbRCW9M5tcO6n07rbGFZovtHRcZkXVMIl0WvpvYNrvXtfXzpj9ra/g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YCaq+h9Q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YCaq+h9Q" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCC621F00A3A; Fri, 29 May 2026 01:28:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780018095; bh=577YCxBQyijttrD/GDDpiPNAegNNoIYy/0sCwpR697Q=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date; b=YCaq+h9QYgsif34iSCrdrUxFZ7HWypSjWzMi/+Y2uOHUybgK+tv4rrtHcJN5NJLwA 9n59vRcZVsIvK5XNv6RBD33zE3xsihareiZb1++jNozMgrLXxSb5nsCd6Co5I753zK 0qOuQOa71NrZwvcgdIFtuuWX0GzGVu/u+fYI+cKlIAZkDJAk+2s6LoFhtsKpHFmRoW EXLuKva+syrO4i/Tm17xluOg226BTHcLp69k+YS0HzGwC2JSsBFhuU0HNf4yqHVTV2 QMJdaCKci1DCYmE8OzMFvQzQAtxvSHzCoMF68Im0jd8VxhM+0IKkS/DcsAoTM2YaEg aWXTdMecL42rg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20260419-hawi-spmi-v3-1-b04ee909cb87@oss.qualcomm.com> References: <20260419-hawi-spmi-v3-0-b04ee909cb87@oss.qualcomm.com> <20260419-hawi-spmi-v3-1-b04ee909cb87@oss.qualcomm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: spmi: glymur-spmi-pmic-arb: Add compatible for Qualcomm Hawi SoC From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Subbaraman Narayanamurthy , David Collins , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kernel@oss.qualcomm.com, Fenglin Wu To: Conor Dooley , Dmitry Baryshkov , Fenglin Wu , Konrad Dybcio , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 18:28:13 -0700 Message-ID: <178001809324.7182.13624403441092934995@lazor> User-Agent: alot/0.12 Quoting Fenglin Wu (2026-04-19 19:25:52) > The PMIC arbiter in the Qualcomm Hawi SoC is version v8.5, which > introduces parity and CRC checks for data received from the PMIC, > as well as NACK checks for command sequences except for read. > All other features in PMIC arbiter remain the same as the one in > the Qualcomm Glymur SoC, with the only differences being some > additional error status checks. >=20 > Therefore, add a string for "qcom,hawi-spmi-pmic-arb" as a compatible > entry for "qcom,glymur-spmi-pmic-arb". >=20 > Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu > --- Applied to spmi-next