From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 930863EA96A; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 23:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783035661; cv=none; b=nUlGwI+cQQ1ZMUuZgmd+29IgYJIioOKgCDz0cxOUYt/0WRHUF4yIfh6a5yXmpQsXoDllCx+ybpI+oYdVgWPiK6WkcOVZnUypLJQfGv8ZA2z91q/VZIZohdhMPpju8cTkxszZ9Jgj/QW3evO6jWywKPdEFVN/e4nkZLPPIl2L0yg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783035661; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Hwx1qpZuVwaL30IKp4VH3yyNQ73sheQp83qEnY2XSAM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PAaex1QaYUZLMLSdSXjSArLCvcPKASIO1/fT22wxddgrKTpOEYeT6vltcde3zEBNBK8+QfLurJjJ/sMLDTIxIKcy95PYNtpTv20VCE6UuFu2VzXWXco/H+XJOftR5XwudclJPORf/BtXSiKpMN6QdrBAqBd5dOqI2TQdpK7UrAM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nA4L3A7S; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nA4L3A7S" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C08A51F000E9; Thu, 2 Jul 2026 23:40:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783035660; bh=2OQ0fbkG60QACnpioEmS0w+2aF423k9gugmMX7erbzc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=nA4L3A7SN1EQ07D0EcNFnYkCRwkuHwKz4QN+UNxNrZ0d0+eJBjr6Fw7955klOmfzL xE4KtgIuw1XLX7F53OCtC+CwM6DZu9Yu9RnWbFzwscKXNBSlgFVdfGP03AGWe3o252 Ncl1B981fCcP4C+DC3m6Y1sE3LxXo8JxSCo2GfpWUnt3f77FN/uk6CM3hNLuXJOzSz uVlGFGsGbi/a+YF/TMdxgwB/7qUkr9jO0/FeLIx53vakmG7ZjruSIWxHGRpjdPnIvl lF0zewMiwCN7Wd+hFvAxIPt8H4f3AMiw8AaZSk5WKN2tpWvg+54xfMXKLQ0S/ic/Ha H8sdPl/g56dkg== From: Bjorn Andersson To: Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Dang Huynh , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115-pro1x: Correct touchscreen GPIO flags Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 18:40:34 -0500 Message-ID: <178303563652.359079.2388660419831828479.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260413090527.53000-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com> References: <20260413090527.53000-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:05:28 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > IRQ_TYPE_xxx flags are not correct in the context of GPIO flags. > These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not > have the same meaning: IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW = 8 = GPIO_TRANSITORY. > > Correct the touchscreen irq-gpios to use proper flags, assuming the > author of the code wanted similar logical behavior: > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6115-pro1x: Correct touchscreen GPIO flags commit: 8e73ae5c34e4fbbd25a8324e3c0eb1e845d7f01e Best regards, -- Bjorn Andersson