From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 23:49:45 +0200
Message-ID: <1787777.qrmnDZUWyu@vostro.rjw.lan>
References: <2660541.BycO7TFnA2@vostro.rjw.lan> <11223831.j9KAEfSQsY@vostro.rjw.lan> <20141017154007.GB29643@kroah.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Return-path: <linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141017154007.GB29643@kroah.com>
Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>, Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Friday, October 17, 2014 05:40:07 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 02:01:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> > 
> > Hving had a couple of chats with Grant and Arnd during LinuxCon EU/LPC, we
> > now have version 5 taking all feedback into account (hopefully).
> > 
> > Changes have been made to patch [02/12] and to patches [09-12/12], although
> > in patches [10-12/12] they are fairly minor.  I have retained the Greg's
> > ACK on patch [02/12], because it is essentially the same that have been
> > posted aleady and ACKed by him (Greg, please let me know if I shouldn't
> > do that) and all the ACKs on the remaining patches except for patch [09/12]
> > which is substantially different.  Still, if reviewers think that their
> > ACKs don't apply any more, please let me know and I'll remove them.
> 
> No objection from me to keep my ACK on those patches, thanks for asking.

Well, that's just fair IMO. :-)

Does [09/12] look good too in particular?

Rafael