Devicetree
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: jacky_chou@aspeedtech.com
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, ratbert@faraday-tech.com,
	edumazet@kernel.org, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] dt-bindings: net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 compatible
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2026 07:58:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <179161911824.434549.4075299707625994950@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006-support_ast2700-v2-1-36de51fb8066@aspeedtech.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found more severe
issue(s) in other patches of this series. This mail is only an FYI, in case
you want to address the nit picks below when you respin.

Low priority / nit picks for your consideration:

- [Low] Already fixed later in this series, so the baseline decision is
  false.

--

dt-bindings: net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 compatible

This adds aspeed,ast2700-mac to the FTGMAC100 compatible list, which
requires the faraday,ftgmac100 fallback. It also updates the RMII RCLK
clock description to include AST2700, and allows the resets property for
AST2700 in the same way as for AST2600.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/faraday,ftgmac100.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/faraday,ftgmac100.yaml
> index d14410018bcf6..bee9570a6f63f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/faraday,ftgmac100.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/faraday,ftgmac100.yaml
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
>                - aspeed,ast2400-mac
>                - aspeed,ast2500-mac
>                - aspeed,ast2600-mac
> +              - aspeed,ast2700-mac
>            - const: faraday,ftgmac100

[Severity: Low]
With this patch, "aspeed,ast2700-mac", "faraday,ftgmac100" becomes a
valid compatible pair. However, at this commit, ftgmac100_of_match[] in
drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c has no aspeed,ast2700-mac entry.
Such a node could only bind through the generic faraday,ftgmac100 entry
(FTGMAC100_FARADAY).

On that path, ftgmac100_probe() would do the following:

  - program the ring-end bits at BIT(15) instead of the Aspeed BIT(30)
  - leave is_aspeed false, so ftgmac100_setup_clk() never claims
    MACCLK/RCLK
  - register the embedded MDIO bus through ftgmac100_setup_mdio()
  - never set a DMA mask wider than 32 bits

Would an AST2700 node work correctly if it fell back to the Faraday
match?

Later patches in this series fix this. "net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700
compatible support" adds FTGMAC100_AST2700 and an aspeed,ast2700-mac
match entry, ahead of the faraday fallback. That entry selects the
BIT(30) and is_aspeed path.

"net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 upper DMA address support" then adds
dma_set_mask_and_coherent(..., DMA_BIT_MASK(35)).

So the problem only shows up when bisecting to this commit, and only with
an out-of-tree AST2700 DTS on an ARM64 build. ARM64 builds are only
enabled by "net: ftgmac100: Allow building on ARM64". Landing the binding
before the driver match is the usual order for dt-bindings series.

[ ... ]

^ annotation: none needed for the [ ... ] above; snipped hunks are the RCLK description and the resets allOf block.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261006-support_ast2700-v2-0-36de51fb8066%40aspeedtech.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-10  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-06  7:20 [PATCH net-next v2 0/6] net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 support Jacky Chou
2026-10-06  7:20 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/6] dt-bindings: net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 compatible Jacky Chou
2026-10-07  7:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-10  7:58   ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-10-06  7:20 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 compatible support Jacky Chou
2026-10-06 16:22   ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-10  7:58   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06  7:20 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: ftgmac100: Enable AST2700 RMII support Jacky Chou
2026-10-06 16:31   ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-08  5:39     ` 回覆: " Jacky Chou
2026-10-08 12:00       ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-08 12:10         ` 回覆: " Jacky Chou
2026-10-07  7:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-10  7:58   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06  7:20 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] net: ftgmac100: Require phy-mode for AST2700 Jacky Chou
2026-10-06 16:21   ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-08  5:20     ` 回覆: " Jacky Chou
2026-10-07  7:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-10  7:58   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06  7:20 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/6] net: ftgmac100: Add AST2700 upper DMA address support Jacky Chou
2026-10-10  7:58   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-06  7:20 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/6] net: ftgmac100: Allow building on ARM64 Jacky Chou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=179161911824.434549.4075299707625994950@kernel.org \
    --to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jacky_chou@aspeedtech.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=ratbert@faraday-tech.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox