From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E80511F791A; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 22:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741904067; cv=none; b=py8/DLcEn0byZyxQcf0faGUZ23IfRdfsuhmGQPZMOSIv7zmXt2Y3Ikzp5atEyy4nA6BNY7eXjePCQ93GJ2XzjX1weQEK/sLaEINCjsz4NVTJTjHQMpuwhJa5+14ShtWk8o0KTPUzvQy3O8GgMoZWTITl9aDwbuuLk2n9CtMQL0E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741904067; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ayENqWRYykqKMSaDdgouWzzeeWpkub6h14X1CWsUIWY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qkBNWutfheXAIS0GaNxFUpnSL9BlbFH5Eiy95jzmfLCWzADuPbqCiYPjH1ZUkMMB53RFQTxqNmX3ApK7ETV2QpQTExWYXAkDAMOzf9EyXh57iZgriWzTwOib3IHo/hW4PD82lWhewQIZoW3M/cXsxE0Q3SppmQbYpRKBKaaOJxg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=hbr+6sOM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="hbr+6sOM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=ayENqWRYykqKMSaDdgouWzzeeWpkub6h14X1CWsUIWY=; b=hbr+6sOMUOohmJsjF5BXVys2lg oAuBs8vSReUdYyq0GZhOT2JLtY1OqxHtEr/x+5UWWm6gv1s8mp0pJfTALrWhkrSglwOhiN4MDu9P3 HMyRbLQvdy6BndmlF15t7lsziwXrqLiUQ3qeUAAtlpIuOVtrsIj1yvX76MNcduysfwTtMclHwZDE9 o95TkLbPWNQxgDpskFxwkFzncrMHnoyj8lwD6RpWXqcb9uD+M0q0BwGv2yUGug5/kRC4CR2zXRRJD g3jFunuwzDFkcbuBmkkcy3NNdf8e1y0KelHXl5i4xSLU9AH6aydSqNfZGmJ5YcpUFh8RNOfXmktkJ 0UnKXYaA==; Received: from i53875bc6.versanet.de ([83.135.91.198] helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tsqoi-0002tC-Ns; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 23:14:16 +0100 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Chukun Pan Cc: amadeus@jmu.edu.cn, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jonas@kwiboo.se, krzk+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add pwm nodes for RK3528 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 23:14:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1819496.VLH7GnMWUR@phil> In-Reply-To: <20250313071031.1840032-1-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn> References: <7779050.EvYhyI6sBW@phil> <20250313071031.1840032-1-amadeus@jmu.edu.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Hi, Am Donnerstag, 13. M=C3=A4rz 2025, 08:10:31 MEZ schrieb Chukun Pan: > Hi, >=20 > > so yes of course the pinctrl needs to be default - simply because > > that's the only pinctrl state mainline supports. >=20 > > But judging by the fact that you're discussing working vs. non-working > > below, can you please check if we should drop the patch for 6.15 till > > that is solved? >=20 > I suggest dropping this patch first, I will send v2 > when this issue is solved. I've dropped the patch now. Heiko