From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] ARM: S5PV210: move to common clk framework Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:42:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1823897.8rOixkM4PW@amdc1227> References: <1380027009-2239-1-git-send-email-m.krawczuk@partner.samsung.com> <5264425E.4040301@samsung.com> <20131021121605.11944.74007@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20131021121605.11944.74007@quantum> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Turquette , Kukjin Kim Cc: Tomasz Figa , rjw@sisk.pl, mark.rutland@arm.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Mateusz Krawczuk , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, thomas.abraham@linaro.org, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, t.stanislaws@samsung.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, rob.herring@calxeda.com, ben-linux@fluff.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, rob@landley.net List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Kukjin, Mike, On Monday 21 of October 2013 05:16:05 Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-10-20 13:51:42) > > On 10/20/13 01:03, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > Hi Mike, Kukjin, Rafael, > > > > > > On Tuesday 24 of September 2013 14:50:06 Mateusz Krawczuk wrote: > > >> This patch series is the new s5pv210 clock implementation > > >> (using common clk framework). > > >> > > >> This implementation is compatible with device tree definition and board > > >> files. > > >> > > >> This patch series is based on linux-next and has been tested on goni and > > >> aquila > > >> boards using board file. > > >> > > >> Since v4: > > >> Corrected mux flags for finpll. > > >> > > >> Since v3: > > >> > > >> Replace s5pv210_clk_register_finpll, by creating mux finpll > > >> with xusbxti and xxti as parrents. > > >> > > >> > > >> Mateusz Krawczuk (3): > > >> clk: samsung: Add clock driver for s5pc110/s5pv210 > > >> Cpufreq: s5pv210 cpufreq fixes for CCF > > >> ARM: s5pv210: Migrate clock handling to Common Clock Framework > > >> > > >> .../bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt | 75 +++ > > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Kconfig | 9 + > > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/Makefile | 4 +- > > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.c | 17 + > > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/common.h | 10 + > > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-goni.c | 2 +- > > >> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/mach-smdkv210.c | 2 +- > > >> arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig | 2 +- > > >> drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 3 + > > >> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c | 673 > > >> +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c > > >> | 6 +- > > >> include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h | 224 +++++++ > > >> 12 files changed, 1019 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > >> create mode 100644 > > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.txt > > >> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s5pv210.c > > >> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/samsung,s5pv210-clock.h > > > > > > I believe this series is reasonable to be applied. Could we agree on > > > the tree it would go through and get all tne required acks? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Tomasz > > > > I agree. > > > > Mike, how do you think the common clk stuff for s5pv210? > > Clock code looks good to me. Which tree do you want to take it through? Seems like we just missed another kernel release. It's a bit sad that it's happening so often for Samsung patches... Best regards, Tomasz