Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: milos: Add Adreno 810 GPU and GMU nodes

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 02/04/2026 10:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 02:17:44AM +0000, Alexander Koskovich wrote:
>> Add GPU and GMU devicetree nodes for the Adreno 810 GPU found on
>> Qualcomm SM7635 (Milos) based devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Koskovich <akoskovich@pm.me>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos.dtsi | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 148 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos.dtsi
>> index 621f05820826..a8feb0339804 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos.dtsi
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,milos-dispcc.h>
>>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,milos-gcc.h>
>>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,milos-gpucc.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,kaanapali-gxclkctl.h>
> 
> Why? My next from 27th Match does not have Milos in that binding. Was it
> added? It's worth mentioning in commit msg.
> 

Now I checked in the cover letter - that patch was rejected. You cannot
depend on rejected patch and still claim that this patchset is ready for
merging. This patchset should be somehow marked that it depends on stuff
which is wrong, usually I recommend marking it as RFC with explanation
in cover letter WHY this is RFC (because it cannot be merged).

Best regards,
Krzysztof