From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] clocksource: Add clockevent support to NPS400 driver Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:34:16 +0100 Message-ID: <1850b6f7-3901-1065-5f35-d738f76fb218@linaro.org> References: <1477224748-25223-1-git-send-email-noamca@mellanox.com> <1477224748-25223-4-git-send-email-noamca@mellanox.com> <20161031105251.GD1506@mai> <20161101200141.GF1506@mai> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Noam Camus Cc: "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Vineet Gupta List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/11/2016 09:30, Noam Camus wrote: >> From: Daniel Lezcano [mailto:daniel.lezcano@linaro.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 10:02 PM > ... >> Assuming cpu0 and cpu1 are sibling, does > >> taskset 0x1 time sleep 2 & taskset 0x2 time sleep 3 > > I will use 16,17 instead of 0,1 >> give a correct result without a dmesg log ? > [root@192.168.8.2 /]$ [root@192.168.8.2 /]$ taskset 65536 time sleep 2 & taskset 131072 time sleep 3 Thanks for providing the numbers. So there is no weird messages in dmesg ? > real 0m 2.54s > user 0m 0.04s > sys 0m 0.14s > real 0m 3.47s > user 0m 0.00s > sys 0m 0.15s > [1]+ Done taskset 65536 time sleep 2 > > Seem OK to me. I'm not sure of that. 2.54 instead of 2 3.47 instead of 3 0.02 time drift could be acceptable but 0.54 or 0.47 is too much. And 0.15 in sys also a big number AFAICT. Is the system in NO_HZ ? -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog