devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
	LMML <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] media: i2c: add support for omnivision's ov2659 sensor
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 22:14:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1868898.q0gy7fiiPL@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8tHrUS-=s8sas-yHy6Pnwbh+wu6KxyHDTfARopguqYL2g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Prabhakar,

On Wednesday 11 March 2015 19:40:13 Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 March 2015 03:35:57 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 11:33:27AM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> >> ...
> >> 
> >> > +static struct ov2659_platform_data *
> >> > +ov2659_get_pdata(struct i2c_client *client)
> >> > +{
> >> > +   struct ov2659_platform_data *pdata;
> >> > +   struct device_node *endpoint;
> >> > +   int ret;
> >> > +
> >> > +   if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) || !client->dev.of_node) {
> >> > +           dev_err(&client->dev, "ov2659_get_pdata: DT Node found\n");
> >> > +           return client->dev.platform_data;
> >> > +   }
> >> > +
> >> > +   endpoint = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(client->dev.of_node, NULL);
> >> > +   if (!endpoint)
> >> > +           return NULL;
> >> > +
> >> > +   pdata = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > +   if (!pdata)
> >> > +           goto done;
> >> > +
> >> > +   ret = of_property_read_u32(endpoint, "link-frequencies",
> >> > +                              &pdata->link_frequency);
> >> 
> >> This is actually documented as being a 64-bit array.
> > 
> > The main purpose of link-frequencies is to restrict the link frequencies
> > acceptable in the system due to EMI requirements. One link frequency
> > should be selected in the array based on the desired format and frame
> > rate. This is usually done by exposing the frequency to userspace through
> > a writable V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ control, and exposing the resulting pixel
> > rate as a read- only V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE control.
> > 
> > V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE is mandatory to use the sensor with several drivers
> > (including omap3isp and omap4iss), so it should really be implemented.
> 
> Even if the sensor supports only one frequency the control needs to be
> implemented ?

The V4L2_CID_PIXEL_RATE must be implemented even for sensors supporting a 
single pixel rate, yes. The reason is that the receiver needs to know the 
sensor pixel rate in order to configure its clocking.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-11 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-08 11:33 [PATCH v4] media: i2c: add support for omnivision's ov2659 sensor Lad Prabhakar
2015-03-10  1:35 ` Sakari Ailus
2015-03-11 18:22   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-03-11 19:40     ` Lad, Prabhakar
2015-03-11 20:14       ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2015-03-10  1:38 ` Sakari Ailus
2015-03-11 11:04 ` Sakari Ailus
     [not found]   ` <20150311110443.GJ11954-S+BSfZ9RZZmRSg0ZkenSGLdO1Tsj/99ntUK59QYPAWc@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-11 12:14     ` Lad, Prabhakar
2015-03-11 18:09   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-03-11 22:53     ` Sakari Ailus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1868898.q0gy7fiiPL@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).