From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C02D5305972 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 10:08:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763114931; cv=none; b=aUIRntiJmlEdSLsrN8urbWk/kPLD9IhNJhR9n46225slYTTcxosna9phGok+T7IcoSUMruq846h/2K8ODABOsyvBBhJr74duwDC78Lgca6gSnL6Io1WEOg8Zp4EglGw5dpidVpmL5FfSSsNFFnf1CSNOrPBLvna589yo3YvajbM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763114931; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DbuYP/JmG2VV2IjwC7x2bFxPqdCjnEgYolGL+cI9+GY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=flXT6HflOlTYCvrj4gl88KrkUrILMiCDSvvPr2Itl6DHnVW27Im+e1zxH4TEJSCZz3Y5fucAdLRvIYT/lwLKuImH5K4rANMsvEjs/PuzFBTAgoBjkbEXhsTxhOG3V6nfzPsPLfov62DalMYVfuaUHJavrGp4pmtzLLITSYwDs7M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=Ve05QFEt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="Ve05QFEt" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To; bh=0ln02T6LojG3buVVSzQ5rx4KEB5R1qyW8EVRoSWyWKU=; b=Ve05QFEtfRuYPM4VuJMRMAy6GB YGt5ufnyN0CxH1fQydVtIT0hfqxHQ8Dgu5XJlf9or/M7oCLPbEueXvuu+a2BQ3lQlobPoaqkdMfBI WcCvdv2oqnVmnXhCtt4vRaRiVBPErQyBzC6G9oY4Ph2wJRdddpA07pLvX5HRaSZxQvBzjG8aEdOyB Cn9+KQUFZJ6INGOoZsnLo1IaAeDANXZfNpenrBUSj3G8WLMKC3LIHqWFGrpOHOwxwd7QRfcxr+sde U5MmXkibCXUT/0HqD+epQ7qWZar+nB8AIv4IJajkAzmy52VBY2uE20q1+NcAa+kdQUwXXo/SJQd/l cvr+OGtg==; Received: from i53875ae8.versanet.de ([83.135.90.232] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vJqj8-0001uf-5N; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 11:08:22 +0100 From: Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= To: FUKAUMI Naoki , Dragan Simic Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , joseph.kogut@gmail.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, jonas@kwiboo.se, kever.yang@rock-chips.com, i@next.chainsx.cn, honyuenkwun@gmail.com, quentin.schulz@cherry.de, pbrobinson@gmail.com, amadeus@jmu.edu.cn, jbx6244@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Radxa CM5 IO Board Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 11:08:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1942576.CQOukoFCf9@diego> In-Reply-To: <194908a1-f956-ba0a-656f-7b1e8456b51d@manjaro.org> References: <20251105051335.17652-1-naoki@radxa.com> <194908a1-f956-ba0a-656f-7b1e8456b51d@manjaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am Freitag, 14. November 2025, 09:32:29 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Normalzeit s= chrieb Dragan Simic: > On Friday, November 14, 2025 09:24 CET, FUKAUMI Naoki w= rote: > > On 11/14/25 16:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On 14/11/2025 08:47, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote: > > >> On 11/14/25 16:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > >>> On 14/11/2025 08:37, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote: > > >>>> Hi Krzysztof, > > >>>> > > >>>> On 11/14/25 16:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > >>>>> On 05/11/2025 08:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > >>>>>> On 05/11/2025 07:57, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote: > > >>>>>>> On 11/5/25 15:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > >>>>>>>> On 05/11/2025 06:13, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> Add device tree binding documentation for the Radxa CM5 IO Bo= ard. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Link: https://dl.radxa.com/cm5/radxa_cm5_product_brief.pdf > > >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: FUKAUMI Naoki > > >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Kogut > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Wrong DCO chain. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> --- > > >>>>>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 7 = +++++++ > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> NAK, you just stolen ownership of an already posted patch. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Read "Changes in v6" and patches; my patches are not the same a= s v5. > > >>>>>>> Your reply is totally inappropriate. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Inappropriate is taking authorship of someone's patch, because w= e all > > >>>>>> expect to preserve the original authorship. That's not only basic > > >>>>>> decency but actually a standard. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Additionally, read Joseph's reply that he wants to continue the = work: > > >>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMWSM7iHtAxewW4JkRqRsifVnccqeFviaCg= eOyprKDr92FOurg@mail.gmail.com/ > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> You clearly do not understand how to continue with someone's wor= k. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> It is still a NAK. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> And I still wait for justification why you took authorship of this > > >>>>> patch, because to my eye you changed here nothing. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> So what did you change HERE that you think you are the author now? > > >>>> > > >>>> Changes in v6: > > >>>> (Patch 1/3) > > >>>> - Fix description; "Radxa CM5" is the correct name > > >>> > > >>> HERE, in this patch. Don't paste me hundreds of unrelated code. Wri= te > > >>> concise and precise answers/comments. > > >> > > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/AE0735A6C797CCFF+10496d73-7c0= a-4884-9561-24721305a24f@radxa.com/ > > >> > > >> | By the way, at some point I switched from "continuing your work" to > > >> | "recreating a new one based on my current work." The results of my > > >> | current work(*3) have changed significantly. > > >=20 > > > So next time I will take your patch, your code, say "I recreated it" = and > > > submit under my authorship and for you it is fine? > >=20 > > Regarding CM5 patches, I'm fine. > >=20 > > > Please take Joseph's patch instead. Read submitting patches doc to > > > understand which one more tag has to be added when sending somoene > > > else's work. > > >=20 > > > In the future, I sincerely suggest avoiding re-creating people's work > > > but building on top, because you just duplicate the effort. > >=20 > > I understand that you don't understand how I made efforts to build my=20 > > work on top of Joseph's patches. >=20 > Maybe a solution for this huge mess could be that Naoki submits > unmodified patches from Joseph first, using the standard procedure > for that, and then the additional patch(es) that improve Joseph's > work? All that in the same series. There is also Co-developed-by as an option.