From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1.manjaro.org (mail1.manjaro.org [142.132.176.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 635E429CE1 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 08:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=142.132.176.110 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763109159; cv=none; b=G+xvZQsNv2ArFRGwNs9BRM6YF+bZ6bYa62yr89nD7Iqm9vil9xvg4M1nEFFzaB61bn12o2IeHE8fp7yYlUcezhf7a1OJE3OZwAOVkxNT+hvz+Vq4IweW6V/lSLOiuouLuNttqoyvIJOi0fr8iPBQxSGpMdFCLVnk7ovq6lVXcT4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763109159; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PrMPYIYYShdJVvkNKcRuup+E5amg0RQJSrG9NsALJA0=; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:References:Date:Cc:To:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Subject; b=nsHQYW2Jqi/k+mBIgL0OEhFfWRvshh4uCJ6dW9xGrZRvVtp0LbsOgY06Tj9HoGoLc0W3Yyg22K0RmxDIR8vT1CWk91Po1lSKnza9fQtO065idi/nb8fzniiGgLZOrytVIPqoNQuRgY4FaNe2P3u6uUiqD9sd6GNgj21ZhtEdI+A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b=sxk3nJWF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=142.132.176.110 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="sxk3nJWF" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPA id BCD5A4109E; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:32:29 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=dkim; t=1763109154; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=H7abZ3ZYaP2vBuHlUKqJanNr1i0yVWF/iFc+uzasKk0=; b=sxk3nJWFscy/o5txYfy8tEv4VhvSemjxPn9yE9PaqeG6IM+EyEcP3+OJ/asIZ7u6WpioI4 QdYs0fg9fTT4v9XHhQFaXxnCuHVDtBUiCelYfpRtaJxRR3OZrWunvmdprbpoazq5jhmmfX 47JOUvnBRSKoaMRT1pm+KGsCtMXFfT6+J48EkwqNI3FMkJZoofV8reJiWjGAP1I5wjrGd4 IRIMTFDwr8ENfb2pA/ZUCoY1QNd9mm7NkuQJUyN/I9OZ0GaVPNHwEPVthqYUOIUW+Bn1Wr AiP4P9bLM9xVz+otB9nzbKGS+ygFDOTT/4OWnZq8g3Ed5uUt9sUFtraz7We/sQ== From: "Dragan Simic" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" References: <20251105051335.17652-1-naoki@radxa.com> <20251105051335.17652-2-naoki@radxa.com> <93deab54-bd5e-433e-acbc-13f6ead47f43@kernel.org> <2177a0f0-68df-495c-b267-18e3d9b6ca80@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:32:29 +0100 Cc: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , heiko@sntech.de, joseph.kogut@gmail.com, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, jonas@kwiboo.se, kever.yang@rock-chips.com, i@next.chainsx.cn, honyuenkwun@gmail.com, quentin.schulz@cherry.de, pbrobinson@gmail.com, amadeus@jmu.edu.cn, jbx6244@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org To: "FUKAUMI Naoki" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <194908a1-f956-ba0a-656f-7b1e8456b51d@manjaro.org> Subject: =?utf-8?q?Re=3A?= [PATCH v6 1/3] =?utf-8?q?dt-bindings=3A?= =?utf-8?q?_arm=3A?==?utf-8?q?_rockchip=3A?= Add Radxa CM5 IO Board User-Agent: SOGoMail 5.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: None On Friday, November 14, 2025 09:24 CET, FUKAUMI Naoki = wrote: > On 11/14/25 16:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 14/11/2025 08:47, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote: > >> On 11/14/25 16:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> On 14/11/2025 08:37, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote: > >>>> Hi Krzysztof, > >>>> > >>>> On 11/14/25 16:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>>> On 05/11/2025 08:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>>>> On 05/11/2025 07:57, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote: > >>>>>>> On 11/5/25 15:43, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 05/11/2025 06:13, FUKAUMI Naoki wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Add device tree binding documentation for the Radxa CM5 IO = Board. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Link: https://dl.radxa.com/cm5/radxa=5Fcm5=5Fproduct=5Fbrie= f.pdf > >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: FUKAUMI Naoki > >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Joseph Kogut > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Wrong DCO chain. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> --- > >>>>>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | = 7 +++++++ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> NAK, you just stolen ownership of an already posted patch. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Read "Changes in v6" and patches; my patches are not the same= as v5. > >>>>>>> Your reply is totally inappropriate. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Inappropriate is taking authorship of someone's patch, because= we all > >>>>>> expect to preserve the original authorship. That's not only ba= sic > >>>>>> decency but actually a standard. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Additionally, read Joseph's reply that he wants to continue th= e work: > >>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMWSM7iHtAxewW4JkRqRsifVnccqeFvia= CgeOyprKDr92FOurg@mail.gmail.com/ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You clearly do not understand how to continue with someone's w= ork. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It is still a NAK. > >>>>> > >>>>> And I still wait for justification why you took authorship of t= his > >>>>> patch, because to my eye you changed here nothing. > >>>>> > >>>>> So what did you change HERE that you think you are the author n= ow? > >>>> > >>>> Changes in v6: > >>>> (Patch 1/3) > >>>> - Fix description; "Radxa CM5" is the correct name > >>> > >>> HERE, in this patch. Don't paste me hundreds of unrelated code. W= rite > >>> concise and precise answers/comments. > >> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/AE0735A6C797CCFF+10496d73-7= c0a-4884-9561-24721305a24f@radxa.com/ > >> > >> | By the way, at some point I switched from "continuing your work"= to > >> | "recreating a new one based on my current work." The results of = my > >> | current work(*3) have changed significantly. > >=20 > > So next time I will take your patch, your code, say "I recreated it= " and > > submit under my authorship and for you it is fine? >=20 > Regarding CM5 patches, I'm fine. >=20 > > Please take Joseph's patch instead. Read submitting patches doc to > > understand which one more tag has to be added when sending somoene > > else's work. > >=20 > > In the future, I sincerely suggest avoiding re-creating people's wo= rk > > but building on top, because you just duplicate the effort. >=20 > I understand that you don't understand how I made efforts to build my=20 > work on top of Joseph's patches. Maybe a solution for this huge mess could be that Naoki submits unmodified patches from Joseph first, using the standard procedure for that, and then the additional patch(es) that improve Joseph's work? All that in the same series.