From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: add cdn-dp node for rk3399. Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 12:52:06 +0100 Message-ID: <1953673.4ODsl89y1u@diego> References: <20180207163150.16332-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Enric Balletbo Serra Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Brian Norris , Guenter Roeck , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , linux-kernel , Chris Zhong List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Enric, Am Dienstag, 13. Februar 2018, 12:36:47 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo Serra: > 2018-02-13 11:42 GMT+01:00 Enric Balletbo i Serra > > : > > Hi Heiko, > > > > On 10/02/18 17:16, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > >> Hi Enric, > >> > >> Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2018, 17:31:49 CET schrieb Enric Balletbo i Serra: > >>> From: Chris Zhong > >>> > >>> Add a node for the cdn DP controller which is embedded in the rk3399 > >>> SoC. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong > >>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra > >>> --- > >>> > >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 50 > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++>> > >> It looks like there is no binding document at all for cdn-dp? At least > >> I couldn't find one and the original series also didn't seem to include > >> one. > >> > >> And while I don't see anything problematic right with the used properties > >> right now, I'd think we should really have a binding and give > >> dt-maintainers a chance to complain, before adding devicetree nodes > >> based on it. > >> > >> I'd guess a mostly usable binding doc should already sit in the chromeos > >> tree, which you could base a v2 of this series on? > > > > Sure, I'll send a v2 for this series. Thanks. > > > > Enric > > So seems that the binding was already discussed and accepted here [1] > but for some reason never landed. So I think that I'll send v2 just > including the binding patch so all can land together. Sounds good? > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9278077/ Nice find and yep, just resending binding + your patches 2+3 is enough then :-) Heiko