From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Refine nanopi4 differences Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:46:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1962946.sYgHsuXWla@phil> References: <2123f6ef0bc4429fc48709af822289c82a63d46f.1546981251.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2123f6ef0bc4429fc48709af822289c82a63d46f.1546981251.git.robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+glpar-linux-rockchip=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: Robin Murphy Cc: linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, tomeu.vizoso-ZGY8ohtN/8qB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am Dienstag, 8. Januar 2019, 22:57:25 CET schrieb Robin Murphy: > The nanopi4 boards differ primarily in their power trees, with the main > 5V and 3.3V rails having very different topologies on the smaller USB-C > powered boards vs. the 12V-powered T4, as well as minor variation in > other regulators related to various external connectors. > > Additionally, the recovery key is only present on the T4 - ADC_IN1 is > simply pulled high and not exposed on the other boards - and the lowest > common denominator for MMC speed is actually HS200 according to the > vendor DTs. > > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy this looks good to me, so only need patch2 to adapt and get reviewed. Heiko