From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
To: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: mpm: Pass MSG RAM slice through phandle
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 13:47:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <198523f5-d06f-15cd-af6c-f391c02bcaa9@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZDAAToSzNLVo6le8@gerhold.net>
On 7.04.2023 13:36, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 09:55:40PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> [...]
>> I don't really know what kind.. I can add something like:
>>
>> rpm {
>> compatible = "qcom,rpm", "simple-mfd";
>>
>> mpm: interrupt-controller {
>> ...
>> };
>>
>
> IMO we should indeed add something like this, because the current
> representation of the RPM below the top level /smd node is misleading.
> "SMD" is not a device, bus, component or anything like that. It is just
> the communication protocol. There should not be a top-level DT node for
> this.
>
> Instead there should be a dedicated device tree node for the RPM like in
> your example above, which will allow adding properties and subnodes to
> it as needed.
>
> For unrelated reasons I actually have some patches for this, that switch
> the /smd top-level node to a "remoteproc-like" node dedicated to the
> RPM, similar to how WCNSS/ADSP/Modem/etc are represented. I need this to
> add additional (optional) properties like "resets" and "iommus" for the
> RPM, but it would allow adding arbitrary subnodes as well:
>
> https://github.com/msm8916-mainline/linux/commit/35231ac28703805daa8220f1233847c7df34589e
>
> I could finish those up and post them if that would help...
Krzysztof, what do you think?
On a note, the bindings check is gone with dtschema-2023.4
Konrad
>
> Thanks,
> Stephan
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> index dcbc5972248b22..1c24b01bd268c8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi
> @@ -310,10 +310,10 @@
> };
> };
>
> - smd {
> - compatible = "qcom,smd";
> + rpm: remoteproc-rpm {
> + compatible = "qcom,msm8916-rpm-proc", "qcom,rpm-proc";
>
> - rpm {
> + smd-edge {
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 168 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> qcom,ipc = <&apcs 8 0>;
> qcom,smd-edge = <15>;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 10:48 [PATCH v2 0/2] Resolve MPM register space situation Konrad Dybcio
2023-04-05 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: mpm: Pass MSG RAM slice through phandle Konrad Dybcio
2023-04-05 12:22 ` Rob Herring
2023-04-05 13:47 ` Rob Herring
2023-04-05 13:49 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-04-06 17:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-06 19:55 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-04-07 7:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-07 11:36 ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-04-12 11:47 ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2023-04-12 11:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-12 12:09 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-04-12 16:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-12 17:06 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-04-13 8:50 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-05-18 12:54 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-04-05 10:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] irqchip: irq-qcom-mpm: Support passing a slice of SRAM as reg space Konrad Dybcio
2023-04-06 4:08 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=198523f5-d06f-15cd-af6c-f391c02bcaa9@linaro.org \
--to=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).