From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: zynqmp: replace gpio-key,wakeup with wakeup-source property Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 11:47:11 +0000 Message-ID: <1a3fb47c-1427-d79e-9cb4-4476fd6a1cfb@arm.com> References: <20181024114540.5196-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20181024114540.5196-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <5f430204-9c97-0351-ff63-e64e8d42da69@xilinx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5f430204-9c97-0351-ff63-e64e8d42da69@xilinx.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Michal Simek , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Sudeep Holla List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05/11/2018 09:32, Michal Simek wrote: > On 24. 10. 18 13:45, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> Most of the legacy "gpio-key,wakeup" boolean property is already >> replaced with "wakeup-source". However few occurrences of old property >> has popped up again, probably from the remnants in downstream trees. >> >> This patch replaces the legacy properties with the unified >> "wakeup-source" property. >> > > Will be good to point to 700a38b27eefc which introduced but that's fine. > If you prefer, you can add the reference as you have already applied. I am fine with that. Are you fine with 32-bit change ? I have posted single patch covering multiple platforms so that I can ask ARM SoC to pick it. If you can Ack it, I will ask them to pick directly. -- Regards, Sudeep