Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: fix defines in pd_vio node for rk3399

[Johan Jonker <jbx6244@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Why is 'pd_tcpc0, pd_tcpc1' grouped under 'pd_vio' instead of VD_LOGIC?

Thanks

On 3/22/20 4:45 PM, Johan Jonker wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The RK3399 TRM uses both
> 
> 'pd_tcpc0, pd_tcpc1'
> 
> as
> 
> 'pd_tcpd0, pd_tcpd1'.
> 
> What should we use here?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> index 8aac201f0..3dc8fe620 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> @@ -1087,12 +1087,12 @@
>>  					pm_qos = <&qos_isp1_m0>,
>>  						 <&qos_isp1_m1>;
>>  				};
>> -				pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPC0 {
>> +				pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPD0 {
>>  					reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD0>;
>>  					clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
>>  						 <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
>>  				};
>> -				pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPC1 {
>> +				pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPD1 {
>>  					reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD1>;
>>  					clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
>>  						 <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
>> -- 
>> 2.11.0
>