From: Ayush Singh <ayushdevel1325@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
Vaishnav M A <vaishnav@beagleboard.org>,
Jason Kridner <jkridner@beagleboard.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] greybus: Add BeaglePlay Linux Driver
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 21:57:52 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bbe7772-09f4-6c5a-8c4d-c88988b34c99@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27a445d6-d904-244f-266c-ffb2d68d0e27@kernel.org>
>> +static void hdlc_handle_rx_frame(struct gb_beagleplay *bg)
>> +{
>> + u8 address = bg->rx_buffer[0];
>> + char *buffer = &bg->rx_buffer[2];
>> + size_t buffer_len = bg->rx_buffer_len - 4;
>> +
>> + switch (address) {
>> + case ADDRESS_DBG:
>> + hdlc_handle_dbg_frame(bg, buffer, buffer_len);
>> + break;
>> + case ADDRESS_GREYBUS:
>> + hdlc_handle_greybus_frame(bg, buffer, buffer_len);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + dev_warn(&bg->serdev->dev, "Got Unknown Frame %u", address);
> ratelimit
> Probably as well in several places with possible flooding.
I don't think `hdlc_handle_rx_frame` is the correct place since it only
processes a single completed HDLC frame. The more appropriate place
would be `hdlc_rx` if we want to limit based on the number of HDLC
frames or `gb_beagleplay_tty_receive` to limit based on the number of bytes.
I would like to ask, though, why is rate limiting required here? Won't
`serdev_device_ops->receive_buf` already rate limit the number of bytes
somewhat? Or is it related to blocking in the
`serdev_device_ops->receive_buf` callback? In the case of latter, it
would probably make sense to ratelimit based on number of frames, I think.
Ayush Singh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-05 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-02 18:28 [PATCH v4 0/3] greybus: Add BeaglePlay Greybus Driver Ayush Singh
2023-09-02 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: Add beaglecc1352 Ayush Singh
2023-09-04 7:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-06 16:47 ` Ayush Singh
2023-09-11 6:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-02 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] greybus: Add BeaglePlay Linux Driver Ayush Singh
2023-09-04 7:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-05 16:27 ` Ayush Singh [this message]
2023-09-06 9:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-06 10:33 ` Ayush Singh
2023-09-06 21:05 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-02 18:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] dts: ti: k3-am625-beagleplay: Add beaglecc1352 Ayush Singh
2023-09-04 7:20 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-09-13 12:57 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] greybus: Add BeaglePlay Greybus Driver Jason Kridner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1bbe7772-09f4-6c5a-8c4d-c88988b34c99@gmail.com \
--to=ayushdevel1325@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=jkridner@beagleboard.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=vaishnav@beagleboard.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).