From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74537C433E6 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 03:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CAD6208E4 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 03:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="LEr4JJb5" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728015AbgH1DOl (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 23:14:41 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:47196 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727954AbgH1DOk (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 23:14:40 -0400 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07S3EZlD118838; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:14:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1598584475; bh=loeDIemJjUVPeE1cWTUci6Wghq6KHUlVFllx5h1Rt+k=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LEr4JJb5eOURW/J17iHQT1EtWfV/vv2k2k82dO2M3E2aS1+jjedPCNfiNCCtToJAX pPdwWjpk3qhBCzGCXusqKHu3m4FldlP+7BdXVniNql0q6zQZo+7f4x8tHxtiFg0dZ+ eA0AGPuCnVqKzuD3+BLAqwbO+kiY+4eypgg3YCWg= Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (dfle115.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.36]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07S3EZ54017744 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:14:35 -0500 Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:14:35 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:14:35 -0500 Received: from [10.24.69.20] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07S3EVhc015962; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:14:32 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: ti: Convert K3 board/soc bindings to DT schema To: Nishanth Menon CC: Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Linux ARM Mailing List , Device Tree Mailing List , Sekhar Nori , Suman Anna , Grygorii Strashko References: <20200827065144.17683-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200827065144.17683-2-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200828004105.givypeu3vextefc6@akan> From: Lokesh Vutla Message-ID: <1c9508ce-9336-e20a-5b58-5dd257247273@ti.com> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 08:44:30 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200828004105.givypeu3vextefc6@akan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Nishanth, On 28/08/20 6:11 am, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 12:21-20200827, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >> Convert TI K3 Board/SoC bindings to DT schema format. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt | 26 ---------------- >> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ >> MAINTAINERS | 2 +- >> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml > > > Thanks for doing this, but I have a problem with dbs_check and dtbs > W=2 build warnings on existing dts files that this exposes further.. IMHO, that should not block the conversion to yaml bindings. May I know the problem you are seeing? > Do you mind pulling this patch out of this j7200 series ? I would > rather us cleanup the warnings a bit as well, and deal with yaml > conversion seperate from j7200 bindings? Ill wait for Rob's view on this. He already asked to convert it during J721e binding update. Not sure we would like to delay any further. Thanks and regards, Lokesh > > We will need Rob's ack anyways, I would rather we look at things > independently. >