From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7125C43331 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0F82067B for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="msIK6Hjb"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="msIK6Hjb" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726785AbfKKGPY (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 01:15:24 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:46948 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726765AbfKKGPX (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 01:15:23 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DA72B60A0B; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:15:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1573452922; bh=BLOQ+eCIjJN4buelWfgp8BiWzMoO2U42JmFRdn7Sa84=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=msIK6Hjb9gtJcWpFPvjysAhT4tjstVf72U2uJlG4K7fD6tyt8uBSbCXawWGFm2ZX4 wGccKh5GrVZmpGLvkgaSbrz0CYNj0ONGNG5aebMdRI8bD62eou2sULvXCsMcY7vCCx BvxdHfvjwCOWljfm/YF4XYSEwFKh35mTc9FBg4Q0= Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B5F6092D; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:15:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1573452922; bh=BLOQ+eCIjJN4buelWfgp8BiWzMoO2U42JmFRdn7Sa84=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=msIK6Hjb9gtJcWpFPvjysAhT4tjstVf72U2uJlG4K7fD6tyt8uBSbCXawWGFm2ZX4 wGccKh5GrVZmpGLvkgaSbrz0CYNj0ONGNG5aebMdRI8bD62eou2sULvXCsMcY7vCCx BvxdHfvjwCOWljfm/YF4XYSEwFKh35mTc9FBg4Q0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 11:45:22 +0530 From: kgunda@codeaurora.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Andy Gross , Mark Rutland , bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, rnayak@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Add support for pm6150 and pm6150l In-Reply-To: <5dc2f71e.1c69fb81.8912a.f2c0@mx.google.com> References: <1572931309-16250-1-git-send-email-kgunda@codeaurora.org> <5dc1cb4c.1c69fb81.af253.0b8a@mx.google.com> <5dc2f71e.1c69fb81.8912a.f2c0@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <1d3436e220ea17ca9d99000922fcb809@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: kgunda@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.5 Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 2019-11-06 22:08, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting kgunda@codeaurora.org (2019-11-05 22:43:59) >> On 2019-11-06 00:49, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> > Quoting Kiran Gunda (2019-11-04 21:21:49) >> >> Add the compatibles and PMIC ids for pm6150 and pm6150l PMICs >> >> found on SC7180 based platforms. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda >> >> --- >> >> - Changes from V1: >> >> Sorted the macros and compatibles. >> > >> > I don't see anything sorted though. >> > >> Sorry .. I might have misunderstood your comment. Let me know if my >> understanding is correct. >> >> >>>> And compatible here. >> >>> And on macro name here. >> >> This means you want to sort all the existing compatible and macros in >> alpha numeric order ? > > Sorry I also got confused on what the driver is doing. I replied on the > original patch with what is preferred. Ok.. I just replied to that.