Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: atmel,sama5d2-flexcom: Add SPI child node ref binding

[<Sergiu.Moga@microchip.com>]

On 28.09.2022 18:23, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Sergiu.Moga@microchip.com wrote:
> 
>> On 28.09.2022 18:03, Lee Jones wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Sergiu Moga wrote:
>>>
>>>> Another functionality of FLEXCOM is that of SPI. In order for
>>>> the proper validation of the SPI children nodes through the binding
>>>> to occur, the proper binding for SPI must be referenced.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga <sergiu.moga@microchip.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>> - use full schema paths
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> v2 -> v3:
>>>> - Added Reviewed-by tag, previously this was [PATCH 3]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> v3 -> v4:
>>>> - Nothing, previously this was [PATCH 5]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> v4 -> v5:
>>>> - Nothing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel,sama5d2-flexcom.yaml       | 5 ++---
>>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Not sure how these can be handled.
>>>
>>> I guess I cannot take these until the other patches are applied.
>>>
>>> NB: The patch doesn't apply cleanly anyway, so will need to be rebased.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The sama5d2-flexcom binding related patches are dependent on:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220916075744.1879428-1-kavyasree.kotagiri@microchip.com/
> 
> I would be very cautious about relying on comments made in the
> cover-letter.  Better to make this a hard requirement and place them
> in the same patch-set.
> 
> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]



Understood, my apologies, I will keep this in mind the next time this 
happens :).

Otherwise, by applying the patch series linked above, my sama5d2-flexcom 
patches should apply cleanly afterwards.

Thanks,
	Sergiu