From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABEBC05027 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 12:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230469AbjBHMGK (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2023 07:06:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50118 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230185AbjBHMGJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2023 07:06:09 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3F2846D47 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 04:06:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id q8so13161754wmo.5 for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 04:06:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nvc70662qT1tudUaeHKF9NVD5XdghLVQqXJv6WZUq7k=; b=zw836VyF/IQ1nIWPBHEaWD1KMAcRZejV5TNNTTZYK5bl6pFq91nb87/AcrOb0DknRE eEVf71lXrwYh5XSJpTY6pLmJ8DJnHNs/vc377cKY3bEzafdVuuR2Rlz2lhZb7FZ3/BlV 0ETVP3jqYfx/Aq7XONWb5SxmSM2B73Z13syqHqNlHvus7gXwTHNSUb/WUBxTImPLW+bB gMcJ1n/V189TYSUdA+Y2aGq52apqnon+Klx75Vm8Ph20UVVt3RM3DmrU+JKT5c232Iz4 13efSas+RcuLHwNU6LISRU3WjBN/+EE6t3wRWryK0JRMxG/GXi3/XLFkH0tq3C5+W55a 1TKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nvc70662qT1tudUaeHKF9NVD5XdghLVQqXJv6WZUq7k=; b=srDOWUvzaqN4ihpcQtrdsDT0C+gZwc2of4RAzyMs1mV/c6opPE/NjFxRsJDDuKrOOp cVlDRQSDcliXoiG0G400YqiRhOXQ/Pk5pAoi6INLrIp1oT4Ug9ZgLAinki1Gb3wku6xN qmppSfbd8xO3fS0bq2FB/CAJKlp+P+wdFR5BtdeCMvJ3ZClecxoBYas58mCH93Wv6oiT frPtS5Zzbn2ni8slWzfGY6EbNhPKKnuSIZkU3dbUl7XBpsbaF4mXremn3EmJLSkUG3NM WKaf41mx3ZKjlt7O/9okzNYZFcny/bflXn91ctDrupp8sT+xPOgA4eUOfNh0sE3JKV/r DuPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKW0x2lJdr+iYyphkfvQzzrp/Kj/pIoac33oHASWVS1J6bLrz+74 XKWCykfRL4CaBKe+cGN/vG/Wmw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/qHwGkIgf/BP+Zq/H3KlrxtCkwAw9/fP+bS3H788mDQqiZKzJlKhYFJKZ9/5o1O+XgwQvo6A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1609:b0:3dc:53a2:2690 with SMTP id m9-20020a05600c160900b003dc53a22690mr6250444wmn.7.1675857963621; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 04:06:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.109] ([178.197.216.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n16-20020a1c7210000000b003dc1d668866sm1718825wmc.10.2023.02.08.04.06.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Feb 2023 04:06:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1dc0589b-2434-47c5-a1d2-d253b06d3a67@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 13:06:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: tegra: Add Tegra234 pinmux device Content-Language: en-US From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Thierry Reding Cc: Prathamesh Shete , jonathanh@nvidia.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, smangipudi@nvidia.com References: <20230207115617.12088-1-pshete@nvidia.com> <20230207115617.12088-3-pshete@nvidia.com> <7bb3e201-954d-c8eb-9430-19626c43fe75@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <7bb3e201-954d-c8eb-9430-19626c43fe75@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/02/2023 13:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> I wonder if there's a good way to detect these. We'd have to run checks >> on the DT source files, so that's a bit difficult. I do have an >> experimental script that tries to capture some common pitfalls on >> sources but it's quite ugly and slow, but I guess I could add something >> like this. But perhaps there are better ways? > > One way to easy spot them is to override always by label, thus every > node defined like above is a new node. However I think we talked about > this and you do not follow this practice, thus there is no way to tell - > is the status reasonable or not. > > Automated tools could help here as well - run fdtdump on DTB and look > for status=okay. Eh, obviously it won't work - every node which was disabled in DTSI and enabled in DTS will have the status=okay... Best regards, Krzysztof