Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: Document the SA8775p ADSP, CDSP and GPDSP

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>]

On 22.05.2024 3:08 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 3:06 PM <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 22/05/2024 15:04, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 2:42 PM <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 22/05/2024 14:08, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>>> From: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Document the compatibles for the components used to boot the ADSP, CDSP0,
>>>>> CDSP1, GPDSP0 and GPDSP1 on the SA8775p SoC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@quicinc.com>
>>>>> Co-developed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    .../bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml       | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>    1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
>>>>> index 73fda7565cd1..9d3a862c39e1 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8550-pas.yaml
>>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ description:
>>>>>    properties:
>>>>>      compatible:
>>>>>        enum:
>>>>> +      - qcom,sa8775p-adsp-pas
>>>>> +      - qcom,sa8775p-cdsp0-pas
>>>>> +      - qcom,sa8775p-cdsp1-pas
>>>>> +      - qcom,sa8775p-gpdsp0-pas
>>>>> +      - qcom,sa8775p-gpdsp1-pas
>>>>>          - qcom,sm8550-adsp-pas
>>>>>          - qcom,sm8550-cdsp-pas
>>>>>          - qcom,sm8550-mpss-pas
>>>>> @@ -44,12 +49,13 @@ properties:
>>>>>
>>>>>      firmware-name:
>>>>>        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string-array
>>>>> +    minItems: 1
>>>>
>>>> This will allow a single firmware name for all compatible,
>>>> which is wrong
>>>>
>>>
>>> So increasing the limit from the default under allOf doesn't seem to
>>> work, should I instead keep this and make the lower limit stricter for
>>> all other models?
>>
>> Yes add minItems in all the allOf:if: and add the missing allOf:if: for
>> the new compatibles to set the minItems, same for memory-region.
>>
>> Or you may simply spin off a new yaml, this one is getting quite large.
>>
> 
> Yeah, maybe that's a better idea.

+ if you get rid of the 0/1 in "nsp0/nsp1" you save a couple more lines

Konrad