From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C488C433E1 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 04:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190A62078A for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 04:58:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="eYKih+B0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725909AbgH0E6m (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:58:42 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:43886 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725854AbgH0E6m (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:58:42 -0400 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07R4wdjW005348; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 23:58:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1598504319; bh=2alI/XzzQeGgZh4pS7eqwKRSfJnwDMvvtZgpsxYLy/Y=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=eYKih+B0f5OXySU+PIaw20A+9MNbs6b6Pe6s+m2V62UdRa3kXCgLWApakEJ5FXEA/ zxMb0E5b0KtJfqUFQ7+1ZFPE9Vu53Ekpr44YePU6qzBBvh/N49bIWN4fxLsygxOx78 n1evNzYKezfEFYnrYZKUnDXbsYZP+NsaJmrkMuFk= Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (dfle115.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.36]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 07R4wd5H128448 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 26 Aug 2020 23:58:39 -0500 Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 23:58:39 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 23:58:39 -0500 Received: from [10.24.69.20] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 07R4waNM013060; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 23:58:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Add C66x & C71x DSP nodes on J721E SoCs To: Suman Anna , Nishanth Menon , Tero Kristo CC: , References: <20200825172145.13186-1-s-anna@ti.com> From: Lokesh Vutla Message-ID: <1fc9eb3f-d56c-5d3e-ecf7-f30711051995@ti.com> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:28:36 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200825172145.13186-1-s-anna@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: devicetree-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 25/08/20 10:51 pm, Suman Anna wrote: > Hi Nishanth, > > The following is a revised version of the series [1] that adds the base > dt nodes for the 2 C66x and 1 C71x DSP remote processors present in MAIN > domain on J721E SoCs, and the required nodes to boot these successfully > on J721E EVM board. It addresses the cleanup comments from you. > > The patches are based on top of the pending ABI 3.0 pull-request [2] and > I have used your temporary staging branch [3] as the baseline. > > Main changes in v2: > - Patch 1 is new, and moves all the mailbox dts nodes from the common > board dts file to the k3-j721e-som-p0.dtsi file > - Patches 3 & 6 are reworked to add the mboxes properties directly > in the k3-j721e-som-p0.dtsi file > - Patches 4 & 8 are rebased versions to sit on top of the modified > mailbox addition patches > - Patches 2, 5 and 8 are unchanged FWIW, Series Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla Thanks and regards, Lokesh