From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Siewior Subject: Re: Device tree configuration for I2C eeprom Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:12:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20080919071238.GA8773@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> References: <16691A8B34B5D9458EA3A1C37A11555A0137F7B6@tanisys-ex2.Tanisys.Local> <20080918221335.GA6420@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <9e4733910809181521r3cd74119tfedd36567e3b5394@mail.gmail.com> <20080919050441.GD25528@secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080919050441.GD25528@secretlab.ca> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org To: Grant Likely Cc: Ayman El-Khashab , devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org, Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org * Grant Likely | 2008-09-18 22:04:41 [-0700]: >No, don't use the generic chip names. Device tree convention is to be >specific and prefix the part number with the vendor name. ie. You should >be using "at,at24c64", not "24c64". What about the i2c drivers which don't have any prefix like the m41t80? Prior commit 0d1cde2 aka "powerpc/i2c: Convert i2c-mpc into an of_platform driver" the ids were converted. > >g. > Sebastian