From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] i2c: i2c-mpc: make I2C bus speed configurable Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:03:49 -0500 Message-ID: <20090408170348.GA27578@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> References: <20090407082052.477328750@denx.de> <53B42D49-C040-442E-8448-7BC3190220A5@kernel.crashing.org> <5FDB097C-7D71-41DF-A4F4-2DE34FD710C5@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5FDB097C-7D71-41DF-A4F4-2DE34FD710C5@kernel.crashing.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org To: Kumar Gala Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:22:29AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > >hrummm. As I mentioned in my reply, I'm not convinced that the board > >one is the right thing in this case. I would have preferred it to be > >deferred. > > which part? I missed this whole thread as I had it forwarding to my > devicetree-discuss folder which I don't normally look at. Can you reorder your filters to check for more frequently read lists first? -Scott