From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Kerr Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/flattree: merge of_find_node_by_phandle Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:48:00 +0800 Message-ID: <200912091748.00122.jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> References: <1260351880.769347.673092420055.1.gpush@pororo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1260351880.769347.673092420055.1.gpush@pororo> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org > [PATCH] of/flattree: merge of_find_node_by_phandle On second thoughts, this should probably be "of" rather than "of/flattree". Cheers, Jeremy