From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Deprecating of_platform, the path from here... Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:56:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20091210.135609.124000757.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20091209.161550.168794100.davem@davemloft.net> <20091209.162121.256573183.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, jk-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org From: Grant Likely Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:47:33 -0700 > Trying to go the other way around (deprecate platform and encouraging > of_platform instead) I don't think will gain much traction; whereas I > think bringing of_platform features into platform will be an easier > sell. I'm trying to be pragmatic here. When people use words like "traction" and "pragmatic" that means they are making decisions for reasons other than technical ones. :-)