From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Kerr Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] arm: use generic infrastructure for early params Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:31:00 +1100 Message-ID: <201001070931.00811.jeremy.kerr@canonical.com> References: <1261479296.245235.191110925832.0.gpush@pororo> <1261479296.246097.171417450949.2.gpush@pororo> <20100106162731.GB1728@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100106162731.GB1728-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Russell, > This is something which should be separate from the rest of the DT > patch - could we have this as a patch which can be applied to the > current kernel tree please? Sure, patch coming. The first three patches of this series (prefixed with arm:, rather than arm- dt:) are all generic arm patches that don't specifically add device tree support, would you like the other two as well? I'm in the process of rebasing my work onto a merge or your and Grant Likely's test-devicetree branch, so future patches should be easier to work with. Cheers, Jeremy