From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: Request review of device tree documentation Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:25:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20100614092559.GA7881@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1276339529.1962.184.camel@pasglop> <1276339684.1962.186.camel@pasglop> <4C13B618.1030006@firmworks.com> <1276383132.1962.195.camel@pasglop> <4C146F18.9030008@firmworks.com> <1276408773.1962.574.camel@pasglop> <20100614073828.GA6095@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4C15DE2E.1050905@firmworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C15DE2E.1050905@firmworks.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org To: Mitch Bradley Cc: Nicolas Pitre , devicetree-discuss , linuxppc-dev , microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, Olof Johansson , Dan Malek , Jeremy Kerr , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 09:45:50PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote: > None of this is a deal-breaker for the kind of debugging tasks that are > the primary use case for the callback. Would you mind explaining what kind of tasks these callbacks will be used for?