From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Deepak Saxena Subject: [PATCH 5/5] of/device: Show even unavailable nodes in procfs Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:29:33 -0800 Message-ID: <20101208192933.GD32473@mentor.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: devicetree-discuss-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org Cc: linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Use the new "raw" of_get_next_child() variant so all device tree nodes will appear in procfs. Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena --- fs/proc/proc_devtree.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c index d9396a4..aa914eb 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *np, const char *p; set_node_proc_entry(np, de); - for (child = NULL; (child = of_get_next_child(np, child));) { + for (child = NULL; (child = _of_get_next_child(np, child));) { /* Use everything after the last slash, or the full name */ p = strrchr(child->full_name, '/'); if (!p) -- 1.6.3.3