From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: OLPC: speed up device tree creation during boot (v2)
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:57:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101223115716.GA2108@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101118083420.GC26398@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > However, I have to vehemently object to putting them in a wider scope
> > than is otherwise necessary. I agree that static variables should be
> > used sparsely if at all (there really are vary few uses of them that are
> > valid), but putting them in a larger scope screams "I'm used in more
> > than one function", and that is *not* a good thing.
>
> That's why we sometimes use the (imperfect) compromise to put them in front of
> that function, not at the top of the file.
>
> Look at the general balance of hardship: very little harm is done (it's not a big
> deal if a variable is only used in a single function) but having it with local
> variables can be _really_ harmful - for example i overlooked them when i reviewed
> this patch. I dont like important details obscured - i like them to be apparent.
> Again, this is something that some people can parse immediately on the visual
> level - me and many others cannot.
As an addendum, beyond my own bad experience with them, see below a recent upstream
fix that shows the kinds of problems that overlooked function scope statics can
cause.
Ingo
------------->
>From 3cb50ddf97a0a1ca4c68bc12fa1e727a6b45fbf2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:53:18 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fix btrfs b0rkage
Buggered-in: 76dda93c6ae2 ("Btrfs: add snapshot/subvolume destroy
ioctl")
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/export.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/export.c b/fs/btrfs/export.c
index 6f04444..659f532 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/export.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/export.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_fh_to_dentry(struct super_block *sb, struct fid *fh,
static struct dentry *btrfs_get_parent(struct dentry *child)
{
struct inode *dir = child->d_inode;
- static struct dentry *dentry;
+ struct dentry *dentry;
struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(dir)->root;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-23 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-12 5:45 [PATCH 3/3] x86: OLPC: speed up device tree creation during boot (v2) Andres Salomon
2010-11-12 7:48 ` Milton Miller
[not found] ` <reply-olpc-3-v2-kM9DGJe42AJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-12 8:27 ` Andres Salomon
2010-11-14 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20101114095013.GB24206-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-15 4:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <4CE0B54E.6000101-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-15 7:02 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20101115070254.GA25243-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-15 17:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <4CE17133.2050101-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-17 6:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: OLPC: speed up device tree creation during boot (v3) Andres Salomon
2010-11-29 23:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: OLPC: speed up device tree creation during boot (v4) Andres Salomon
2010-11-18 8:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: OLPC: speed up device tree creation during boot (v2) Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20101118083420.GC26398-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-18 11:02 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-11-18 15:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <4CE54064.6010702-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-18 17:41 ` Andres Salomon
[not found] ` <20101118094153.4515cbc2-pFFUokh25LWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-18 17:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <4CE5670B.1060300-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2010-11-19 20:24 ` Andres Salomon
2010-12-23 11:57 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101223115716.GA2108@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=dilinger@queued.net \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).