From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt: Move device tree documentation out of powerpc directory Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:12:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20110126191210.GA3377@merkur.ravnborg.org> References: <1296062434-18027-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1296062434-18027-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Grant Likely Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:20:34AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > The device tree is used by more than just PowerPC. Make the documentation > directory available to all. How does the planned stucture look like for this new directory? I see that in your move the architecture is dropped. But some of these looks like they are arch candidates. The 4xx/* for example looks like powerpc stuff that should be in a powerpc directory. Another is sja1000. This is obviously a can driver. So how about mirroring the kernel structure: Proposal: drivers/net/can <=== sja1000.txt drivers/ata/ <=== fsl/sata.txt arch/powerpc <=== powerpc specific stuff This is a bit more effort but then we end up with a well-known structure. Sam