From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/5] arm/dt: add basic mx51 device tree support Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 01:45:12 -0700 Message-ID: <20110316084512.GI2273@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1299733185-2172-1-git-send-email-jason.hui@linaro.org> <1299733185-2172-2-git-send-email-jason.hui@linaro.org> <20110315070342.GB23050@angua.secretlab.ca> Reply-To: paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linaro-dev-bounces-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org Errors-To: linaro-dev-bounces-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org To: Grant Likely Cc: linaro-dev-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, patches-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 aFt 11:03:55PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Jason Hui wrote: > > Hi, Grant, > > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > >> Hi Jason, > >> > >> Minor comments below. > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:59:41PM +0800, Jason Liu wrote: > >>> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu > >>> Signed-off-by: Jason Liu > >> > >> This looks wrong. =A0You should only have one s-o-b line. =A0Use one e= mail > >> addr or the other. =A0Not both. > > > > I just take the same approach as this link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/= 12/17/363 > > If you think it's not applicable, I can change it. > = > Yeah, I don't think that's right. A s-o-b is a personal assertion > that the patch is to the best of your knowledge that you have the > right to submit it for inclusion in the kernel (see section 12 of > Documentation/SubmittingPatches). It doesn't make any statements > about who owns the copyright on the patch or other issues of corporate > ownership. Companies may have policies about which email address > employees use when signing off, but that isn't what the s-o-b protocol > is for. > = > Since there isn't more than one of you, you should only have one s-o-b > line. :-) > = > Paul, since your email was presented as evidence, would you care to > offer a counter-argument? :-) How about https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/22/668? ;-) There is only one of me, but I am acting in two roles. Thanx, Paul