From: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger-pFFUokh25LWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Daniel Drake <dsd-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] switch DT creation to using of_attach_node (v2)
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:45:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110318054517.GI18545@angua.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300408356-15253-1-git-send-email-dilinger-pFFUokh25LWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:32:32PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> This is attempt #2 to make OF core use of_attach_node for both promtree
> and flattree building. This reworks of_attach_node quite a bit to conform
> with our expectations of how the DT should look in memory.
>
> It's different in many ways from the original patches, so it's worth
> reviewing each in their entirety.
Thanks Andres,
Ping me on this stuff after the merge window. I don't have time to
look at it now, but I'll do so right all the stuff for .39 is taken
care of.
g.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-18 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-18 0:32 [PATCH 0/4] switch DT creation to using of_attach_node (v2) Andres Salomon
[not found] ` <1300408356-15253-1-git-send-email-dilinger-pFFUokh25LWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
2011-03-18 0:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] of: rework of_attach_node, removing CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC Andres Salomon
2011-04-08 16:52 ` Grant Likely
2011-03-18 0:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] of/promtree: switch to building the DT using of_attach_node Andres Salomon
2011-03-18 0:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] of/flattree: minor cleanups Andres Salomon
2011-03-23 20:35 ` Grant Likely
2011-03-18 0:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] of/flattree: use of_attach_node to build tree Andres Salomon
2011-03-18 5:45 ` Grant Likely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110318054517.GI18545@angua.secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely-s3s/wqlpoipyb63q8fvjnq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dilinger-pFFUokh25LWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dsd-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).