Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>]

On Friday 18 March 2011, Andy Green wrote:
> On 03/17/2011 11:27 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
> 
> > The patch below also looks right to me.  I believe it also has the
> > advantage of u-boot already knowing how to update the
> > local-mac-address property at boot time.
> 
> In my (tested, working, complete) patch series, I allow platform_data 
> based override of MAC at usbnet level, so all the drivers can benefit 
> from it.
>
> Is this not a case of "small thinking" from a Device Tree perspective 
> that Arnd's patch only targets smsc95xx?  Or did I miss some 
> disadvantage to allowing this functional configuration option at usbnet 
> layer?

I think either way works (usb-net or individual drivers), the difference is 
which information you use when both a hardware MAC address and the
local-mac-address property are used. Your patch uses the local-mac-address,
mine would use the hardware mac address and only fall back to the
property if there is no other one.

I still need to look at your patch series, I didn't realize you had
already sent it.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html