From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: RFC: Platform data for onboard USB assets Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:15:09 +0000 Message-ID: <20110318151508.GC677@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20110311165642.GA9996@kroah.com> <201103172333.01474.arnd@arndb.de> <4D82979B.2050003@linaro.org> <201103181600.09877.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201103181600.09877.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-usb-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: andy.green-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Greg KH , Grant Likely , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, Nicolas Pitre , Linux USB list , lkml List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:00:09PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 18 March 2011, Andy Green wrote: > > What's the plan for leveraging that level of generality on "dynamically > > probed devices"? I mean I know what I want to use this for and the > > platform_data scheme covers all the soldered-on-the-board cases fine. > Isn't there also a device tree based OMAP tree that can boot on > Panda and is just waiting to get merged? Did the stuff with multiple interrupt controllers get resolved? That's pretty important for practical use. There have been quite a few iterations of the device tree patches for ARM over the last release but the iterations I looked at all seemed to be bugfix type stuff. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html