From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] of/clock: eliminate function __of_clk_get_from_provider Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:41:35 -0600 Message-ID: <20110331204135.GC31846@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <1300472672-13392-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1300472672-13392-7-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1300472672-13392-7-git-send-email-shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Shawn Guo Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linaro-dev-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org, patches-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 02:24:32AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > With the platform clock support, the 'struct clk' should have been > associated with device_node->data. So the use of function > __of_clk_get_from_provider can be eliminated. > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo Not really true since a device node describes a clock provider which may be able to provide more than one clock output. g. > --- > drivers/of/clock.c | 23 ++--------------------- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/of/clock.c b/drivers/of/clock.c > index 7b5ea67..1b34937 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/clock.c > +++ b/drivers/of/clock.c > @@ -71,24 +71,6 @@ void of_clk_del_provider(struct device_node *np, > mutex_unlock(&of_clk_lock); > } > > -static struct clk *__of_clk_get_from_provider(struct device_node *np, const char *clk_output) > -{ > - struct of_clk_provider *provider; > - struct clk *clk = NULL; > - > - /* Check if we have such a provider in our array */ > - mutex_lock(&of_clk_lock); > - list_for_each_entry(provider, &of_clk_providers, link) { > - if (provider->node == np) > - clk = provider->get(np, clk_output, provider->data); > - if (clk) > - break; > - } > - mutex_unlock(&of_clk_lock); > - > - return clk; > -} > - > struct clk *of_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id) > { > struct device_node *provnode; > @@ -123,9 +105,8 @@ struct clk *of_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id) > __func__, prop_name, dev->of_node->full_name); > return NULL; > } > - clk = __of_clk_get_from_provider(provnode, prop); > - if (clk) > - dev_dbg(dev, "Using clock from %s\n", provnode->full_name); > + > + clk = provnode->clk; > > of_node_put(provnode); > > -- > 1.7.1 >