From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
hpa@zytor.com, Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] powerpc: make irq_{alloc, free}_virt private and remove count argument
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 09:59:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110504155905.GB3317@ponder.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304387267.2513.298.camel@pasglop>
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:47:47AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 14:01 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > irq_alloc_virt() and irq_free_virt() aren't called anywhere but from
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c, and they are only ever called with count=1.
> > This patch removes the prototypes from the header file, removes the
> > count arguments, and cuts out the dead code.
> >
> > Also removes obsolete references to irq_early_init()
>
> Nack.
>
> The count was intended to be able to allocate blocks of interrupts. This
> was not used so far because we didn't support MSI blocks (for non-X
> MSIs) but that is coming, and unfortunately, the API that was designed
> for that is crap and requires contiguous IRQ numbers on the linux side
> as well as on the device side (well device side is a HW requirement but
> we could have been smarter on the Linux side).
>
> So the ability to allocate blocks will be needed. In fact it's not clear
> yet whether we'll also need them to be naturally aligned powers of two
> or not at this stage. It depends how the bloody API is going to be used
> by drivers.
Heh, I wondered about that, but there hasn't been any users for at
least 5 years (as evidenced by commit e12514650b, "Fix loop logic in
irq_alloc_virt()") so it was looking pretty dead, and it made the
patch to switch to using irq_alloc_desc*() quite a bit simpler if it
was removed. :-)
I'm not particularly attached to this patch, so I can drop it from the
series.
g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-04 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-28 20:01 [PATCH 0/6] General device tree irq domain infrastructure Grant Likely
2011-04-28 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] powerpc: stop exporting irq_map Grant Likely
2011-05-03 1:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-04-28 20:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] powerpc: make irq_{alloc, free}_virt private and remove count argument Grant Likely
2011-05-03 1:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-04 15:59 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2011-05-05 0:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-04-28 20:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc: Make struct irq_host semi-private by moving into irqhost.h Grant Likely
2011-05-03 1:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-04-28 20:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] dt: generalize irq_of_create_mapping() Grant Likely
2011-05-03 1:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-04 16:05 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20110504160502.GC3317-e0URQFbLeQY2iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-05 0:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-04-28 20:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc: move irq_alloc_descs_at() call into irq_alloc_virt() Grant Likely
2011-04-28 20:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc: use irq_alloc_desc() to manage irq allocations Grant Likely
2011-04-29 16:16 ` [PATCH 0/6] General device tree irq domain infrastructure Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2011-04-29 17:43 ` Grant Likely
2011-05-03 1:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-04 15:52 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20110504155227.GA3317-e0URQFbLeQY2iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
2011-05-05 0:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-05 8:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-05 14:07 ` Grant Likely
2011-05-05 14:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110504155905.GB3317@ponder.secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=dirk.brandewie@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).