Next formal dtc release?

Next formal dtc release?

[David VomLehn]

I'd like to deploy dtc outside our kernel but have an IT department that
wants a formally versioned release. The last such release was 1.2.0 back in
July 2008 and it was missing a whole bunch of features that are required
for work we're doing.  Anything we can do to make a 1.2.1 or 1.3.0 tag
get assigned?
-- 
David VL

Re: Next formal dtc release?

[Grant Likely]

There hasn't been any plans to do so, but if you need it then we can
probably do so.

Jon, how do you feel about cutting a release?

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:26 PM, David VomLehn <dvomlehn-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> I'd like to deploy dtc outside our kernel but have an IT department that
> wants a formally versioned release. The last such release was 1.2.0 back in
> July 2008 and it was missing a whole bunch of features that are required
> for work we're doing.  Anything we can do to make a 1.2.1 or 1.3.0 tag
> get assigned?
> --
> David VL
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
>



-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.

Re: Next formal dtc release?

[Jon Loeliger]

> There hasn't been any plans to do so, but if you need it then we can
> probably do so.
> 
> Jon, how do you feel about cutting a release?

Happy to do so.  I'll try to pull one together in the
next couple days or so.

jdl

Re: Next formal dtc release?

[David VomLehn]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:19:31PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > There hasn't been any plans to do so, but if you need it then we can
> > probably do so.
> > 
> > Jon, how do you feel about cutting a release?
> 
> Happy to do so.  I'll try to pull one together in the
> next couple days or so.
> 
> jdl

Thanks, I appreciate it. I've been using the current tip for quite a while
without any problems; I'd guess that would make a good place for a release.

-- 
David VL

Re: Next formal dtc release?

[David Gibson]

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 03:14:26PM -0700, David VomLehn wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:19:31PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > > There hasn't been any plans to do so, but if you need it then we can
> > > probably do so.
> > > 
> > > Jon, how do you feel about cutting a release?
> > 
> > Happy to do so.  I'll try to pull one together in the
> > next couple days or so.
> > 
> > jdl
> 
> Thanks, I appreciate it. I've been using the current tip for quite a while
> without any problems; I'd guess that would make a good place for a release.

Because we have a pretty thorough testsuite, the current tip is nearly
always suitable for release.  That's one of the reasons we frequently
forget to get around to doing a formal release.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Re: Next formal dtc release?

[Robert Schwebel]

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:41:28AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > Jon, how do you feel about cutting a release?
> > >
> > > Happy to do so.  I'll try to pull one together in the next couple
> > > days or so.
> >
> > Thanks, I appreciate it. I've been using the current tip for quite a
> > while without any problems; I'd guess that would make a good place
> > for a release.
>
> Because we have a pretty thorough testsuite, the current tip is nearly
> always suitable for release. That's one of the reasons we frequently
> forget to get around to doing a formal release.

any news about a release?

rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Re: Next formal dtc release?

[Jon Loeliger]

> > Because we have a pretty thorough testsuite, the current tip is nearly
> > always suitable for release. That's one of the reasons we frequently
> > forget to get around to doing a formal release.
> 
> any news about a release?

I am out of sorts Saturday, but I will try to do it Sunday.
I have one "tested, it works" confirmation so far.  Others?

I'm positing of a 1.3.0 release number for it.

jdl

Re: Next formal dtc release?

[Jon Loeliger]

> 
> I am out of sorts Saturday, but I will try to do it Sunday.
> I have one "tested, it works" confirmation so far.  Others?
> 
> I'm positing of a 1.3.0 release number for it.

Guys,

I have signed and pushed out a tagged Version 1.3.0 release
of the Device Tree Compiler.  Find it at git.jdl.com.

If there are issues with it, please let me know!

Thanks,
jdl

Re: Next formal dtc release?

[Robert Schwebel]

On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 03:11:38PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> I have signed and pushed out a tagged Version 1.3.0 release
> of the Device Tree Compiler.  Find it at git.jdl.com.
>
> If there are issues with it, please let me know!

\o/

Thx from the Distro guys,
rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Re: Next formal dtc release?

[Tabi Timur-B04825]

On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Jon Loeliger <jdl-CYoMK+44s/E@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> I have signed and pushed out a tagged Version 1.3.0 release
> of the Device Tree Compiler.  Find it at git.jdl.com.

Thanks, Jon.

Can someone update libfdt in the U-Boot, please?  I need support for
the ePAPR-compliant "phandle" property.

I don't know what the process is for getting libfdt officially updated
in U-boot.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale