From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: mxc: use ARCH_NR_GPIOS to define gpio number
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:24:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110707192429.GJ2824@ponder.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110707074755.GX6069@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:47:55AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:37:42AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > The patch removes MXC_GPIO_IRQS and instead uses ARCH_NR_GPIOS to
> > define gpio number. This change is need when we change mxc gpio
> > driver to be device tree aware. When migrating the driver to device
> > tree, pdev->id becomes unusable. It requires driver get gpio range
> > from gpio core, which will dynamically allocates number from
> > ARCH_NR_GPIOS to 0.
> >
> > As a bonus point, it removes lines of '#if' and make the code a
> > little bit cleaner. The side effect is the waste of number. But
> > this is not a point when we go single image.
>
> I'm not sure whether we really should depend on an externally defined
> ARCH_NR_GPIOS. Someone might get the idea to change this to a lower
> value. Maybe we should define this ourselves instead.
>
> Any other opinions?
>
> Otherwise I'm fine with this patch.
/me would like to be rid of ARCH_NR_GPIOS entirely, but we're a long
way away from that.
g.
>
> Sascha
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h | 21 +++------------------
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h
> > index 35c89bc..00e812b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h
> > @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
> > #ifndef __ASM_ARCH_MXC_IRQS_H__
> > #define __ASM_ARCH_MXC_IRQS_H__
> >
> > +#include <asm-generic/gpio.h>
> > +
> > /*
> > * SoCs with TZIC interrupt controller have 128 IRQs, those with AVIC have 64
> > */
> > @@ -22,30 +24,13 @@
> >
> > #define MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START MXC_INTERNAL_IRQS
> >
> > -/* these are ordered by size to support multi-SoC kernels */
> > -#if defined CONFIG_SOC_IMX53
> > -#define MXC_GPIO_IRQS (32 * 7)
> > -#elif defined CONFIG_ARCH_MX2
> > -#define MXC_GPIO_IRQS (32 * 6)
> > -#elif defined CONFIG_SOC_IMX50
> > -#define MXC_GPIO_IRQS (32 * 6)
> > -#elif defined CONFIG_ARCH_MX1
> > -#define MXC_GPIO_IRQS (32 * 4)
> > -#elif defined CONFIG_ARCH_MX25
> > -#define MXC_GPIO_IRQS (32 * 4)
> > -#elif defined CONFIG_SOC_IMX51
> > -#define MXC_GPIO_IRQS (32 * 4)
> > -#elif defined CONFIG_ARCH_MX3
> > -#define MXC_GPIO_IRQS (32 * 3)
> > -#endif
> > -
> > /*
> > * The next 16 interrupts are for board specific purposes. Since
> > * the kernel can only run on one machine at a time, we can re-use
> > * these. If you need more, increase MXC_BOARD_IRQS, but keep it
> > * within sensible limits.
> > */
> > -#define MXC_BOARD_IRQ_START (MXC_INTERNAL_IRQS + MXC_GPIO_IRQS)
> > +#define MXC_BOARD_IRQ_START (MXC_INTERNAL_IRQS + ARCH_NR_GPIOS)
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MACH_MX31ADS_WM1133_EV1
> > #define MXC_BOARD_IRQS 80
> > --
> > 1.7.4.1
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-07 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-06 16:37 [PATCH v3 0/3] Add device tree probe for imx/mxc gpio Shawn Guo
[not found] ` <1309970263-13239-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-06 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] gpio/mxc: get rid of the uses of cpu_is_mx() Shawn Guo
2011-07-06 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: mxc: use ARCH_NR_GPIOS to define gpio number Shawn Guo
2011-07-07 7:47 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-07-07 15:13 ` Shawn Guo
[not found] ` <20110707151331.GB12722-+NayF8gZjK2ctlrPMvKcciBecyulp+rMXqFh9Ls21Oc@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-07 19:26 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-07 19:24 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2011-07-06 16:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] gpio/mxc: add device tree probe support Shawn Guo
2011-07-07 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Add device tree probe for imx/mxc gpio Grant Likely
2011-07-08 10:36 ` Sascha Hauer
2011-07-08 18:38 ` Grant Likely
2011-07-09 6:30 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110707192429.GJ2824@ponder.secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).