From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/smsc911x: add device tree probe support Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:26:29 -0600 Message-ID: <20110729162629.GI11164@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <1311587040-8988-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20110725213723.GI26735@ponder.secretlab.ca> <20110726010154.GG21641@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <20110726013026.GH21641@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <20110729023626.GB1946@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <20110729154723.GC11164@ponder.secretlab.ca> <20110729160343.GA2241@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110729160343.GA2241@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Shawn Guo Cc: Nicolas Pitre , patches@linaro.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Steve Glendinning , Shawn Guo , "David S. Miller" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:03:44AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:47:23AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:36:26AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > Since I do not get any suggestion here, I'm going to follow the driver > > > name to use '911' as the model number. Please tell me if there is any > > > better one. > > > > What is the manufacturer part name? lan9111 or lan91c11? The > > manufacturer's documented part number is almost always preferred. > > > I just posted the v2 of the patch, and chose to use 'smsc,lan9115' > which is the first model supported in the driver. This is the same > approach I used with i.mx device bindings. You haven't answered the question. g.