From: Robin Holt <holt-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
Kumar Gala
<galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Grant Likely
<grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
PPC list <linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] powerpc: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:30:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110810183016.GY4926@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E42C196.7030708-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:36:22PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 12:19 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 08/10/2011 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> >>> -CPI Clock- Can Protocol Interface Clock
> >>> - This CLK_SRC bit of CTRL(control register) selects the clock source to
> >>> - the CAN Protocol Interface(CPI) to be either the peripheral clock
> >>> - (driven by the PLL) or the crystal oscillator clock. The selected clock
> >>> - is the one fed to the prescaler to generate the Serial Clock (Sclock).
> >>> - The PRESDIV field of CTRL(control register) controls a prescaler that
> >>> - generates the Serial Clock (Sclock), whose period defines the
> >>> - time quantum used to compose the CAN waveform.
> >>> +- compatible : Should be "fsl,flexcan" and optionally
> >>> + "fsl,flexcan-<processor>"
> >>
> >> fsl,<processor>-flexcan, and it should not be optional, and should come
> >> before "fsl,flexcan".
> >>
> >> Also may want to list fsl,p1010-rdb as a "canonical compatible" for
> >> anything which is backwards compatible with p1010's implementation.
> >
> > How do I specify 'canonical compatible'?
>
> Something like:
>
> compatible: Should be "fsl,<processor>-flexcan" and "fsl,flexcan".
>
> An implementation should also claim any of the following compatibles
> that it is fully backwards compatible with:
>
> - fsl,p1010-rdb
I am so confused. fsl,p1010-flexcan refers, in my mind at least, to
a particular chiplet on the p1010 freescale processor. fsl,p1010-rdb
would mean nothing to me as that is a p1010 processor with two flexcan
chiplets wired to a pair of DB-9 jacks. For the driver, what additional
information is being conveyed?
Let's cut to the chase. Here is what I have after incorporating your
earlier comment about the compatible line. Please mark this up to
exactly what you are asking for.
Thanks,
Robin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flexcan CAN contoller on Freescale's ARM and PowerPC processors
Required properties:
- compatible : Should be "fsl,<processor>-flexcan" and "fsl,flexcan"
- reg : Offset and length of the register set for this device
- interrupts : Interrupt tuple for this device
Example:
can@1c000 {
compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan", "fsl,flexcan";
reg = <0x1c000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <48 0x2>;
interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
};
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-10 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1312993670-23999-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <1312993670-23999-1-git-send-email-holt-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-10 16:27 ` [PATCH v11 3/5] flexcan: Add of_match to platform_device definition Robin Holt
2011-08-10 16:27 ` [PATCH v11 5/5] powerpc: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding Robin Holt
2011-08-10 16:56 ` Scott Wood
[not found] ` <4E42B83C.2040705-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-10 17:19 ` Robin Holt
2011-08-10 17:36 ` Scott Wood
[not found] ` <4E42C196.7030708-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-10 18:30 ` Robin Holt [this message]
2011-08-10 18:40 ` Scott Wood
[not found] ` <4E42D09E.4080405-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-10 18:45 ` Robin Holt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110810183016.GY4926@sgi.com \
--to=holt-sj/iwh9buns@public.gmane.org \
--cc=B22300-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).