From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Iles Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/12] arm/tegra: Add device tree support to pinmux driver Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 11:48:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20110813104850.GD2643@pulham.picochip.com> References: <1313189697-21287-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <1313189697-21287-11-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <20110813104323.GC2643@pulham.picochip.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110813104323.GC2643@pulham.picochip.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Jamie Iles Cc: Stephen Warren , Erik Gilling , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Colin Cross , Olof Johansson , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:43:23AM +0100, Jamie Iles wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 04:54:55PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c > > index 05fa1a3..33246c2 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > > > #include > > @@ -147,6 +148,41 @@ static const char *func_name(enum tegra_mux_func func) > > return tegra_mux_names[func]; > > } > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > > +static int func_enum(const char *name, enum tegra_mux_func *func_out) > > +{ > > + int func; > > + > > + if (!strcmp(name, "RSVD1")) { > > + *func_out = TEGRA_MUX_RSVD1; > > + return 0; > > + } > > + if (!strcmp(name, "RSVD2")) { > > + *func_out = TEGRA_MUX_RSVD2; > > + return 0; > > + } > > + if (!strcmp(name, "RSVD3")) { > > + *func_out = TEGRA_MUX_RSVD3; > > + return 0; > > + } > > + if (!strcmp(name, "RSVD4")) { > > + *func_out = TEGRA_MUX_RSVD4; > > + return 0; > > + } > > + if (!strcmp(name, "NONE")) { > > + *func_out = TEGRA_MUX_NONE; > > + return 0; > > + } > > + > > + for (func = 0; func < TEGRA_MAX_MUX; func++) > > + if (!strcmp(name, tegra_mux_names[func])) { > > + *func_out = func; > > + return 0; > > + } > > + > > + return -EINVAL; > > +} > > +#endif > > > > static const char *tri_name(unsigned long val) > > { > > @@ -666,15 +702,94 @@ void tegra_pinmux_config_pullupdown_table(const struct tegra_pingroup_config *co > > } > > } > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > > +static void __init tegra_pinmux_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev) > > +{ > > + int pg; > > + > > + for (pg = 0; pg < TEGRA_MAX_PINGROUP; pg++) { > > + const char *pg_name = pingroup_name(pg); > > + struct tegra_pingroup_config config; > > + struct device_node *pg_node; > > + int ret; > > + const char *s; > > + > > + pg_node = of_find_child_node_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, > > + pg_name); > > + if (pg_node == NULL) > > + continue; > > Rather than iterating over all of the mux names in the pinmux driver and > searching for a matching DT node, could you not do it the other way > round? So do an for_each_child_of_node() on the pinmux node then find > the matching pingroup keyed by the node name? This would eliminate > of_find_child_node_by_name(). You could also catch invalid > configurations for non-existent pins this way. I just re-read your introduction email and saw you've already discussed this! Would this require an explicit pin name property though or could you just key off of the pg_node->name? Jamie