devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brown <davidb-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
To: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: of_iomap() matched with plan iounmap()
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:02:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110818170226.GA16721@huya.qualcomm.com> (raw)

The SPARC target contains of_ioremap() and of_iounmap(), which various
drivers use (generally inside of CONFIG_SBUS).

include/linux/of_address.h contains a definition for of_iomap(), but
not corresponding unmap call.  Code using this calls the regular
iounmap().

Is it safe to assume that of_iomap() will always be based on ioremap()
and therefore it is safe to use iounmap(), or would it be better to
define another name for drivers to use as the inverse of of_iomap().
I'm not sure what to call it, since of_iounmap() is already taken by
SPARC.

Thanks,
David

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

             reply	other threads:[~2011-08-18 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-18 17:02 David Brown [this message]
2011-08-19  3:34 ` of_iomap() matched with plan iounmap() David Miller
2011-08-19 12:26   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-19 13:26     ` David Miller
     [not found]       ` <20110819.062609.1865751197015675220.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-22 14:07         ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-22 18:47           ` David Miller
2011-08-19 21:19     ` David Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110818170226.GA16721@huya.qualcomm.com \
    --to=davidb-sgv2jx0feol9jmxxk+q4oq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).